bioRxivEcology
Evaluation of habitat protection under the European Natura 2000 conservation network - the example for Germany
Abstract
The worlds largest network of protected areas - Natura 2000 (N2000) - has been implemented to protect Europes biodiversity. N2000 is built upon two cornerstones, the Birds Directive, which lists 230 bird species and the Habitats Directive, which lists next to a variety of species 230 habitat types, to be protected. There is evidence of the positive impact of the Directives on the EUs biodiversity, although the overall improvement reported for species in favourable condition in the last assessment was low. However, most of the assessments are species focused, while habitats have received very little attention. Here we developed a generic workflow, which we exemplified for Germany, to assess the status of habitat coverage within the N2000 network, combining information from publicly available data sources. Applying the workflow allows identifying gaps in habitat protection, followed by the prioritization of potential areas of high protection value, using the conservation planning software Marxan. We found that, in Germany, N2000 covers all target habitats. However common habitats were proportionally underrepresented relative to rare ones, which contrasts with comparable studies for species. Moreover, the German case study suggests that especially highly protected areas (i.e. covered by more than 90% with N2000 sites) build an excellent basis towards a cost-effective and efficient conservation network. Our workflow provides a generic approach to deal with the popular problem of missing habitat distribution data outside of N2000 sites, information which is however crucial for managers to plan conservation action appropriately across Europe. To avoid a biased representation of habitat types within N2000, our results underpin the importance of defining qualitative and quantitative conservation targets which will allow assessing the trajectory of habitat protection in Europe as well as adjusting the network accordingly - a future necessity in the light of climate change.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of areas of very high biodiversity value to achieve the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 key commitments.
I. V. Miu, L. Rozylowicz, … P. Anastasiu·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2020
- Small patches dominate the Natura 2000 network of protected areas in Europe
Jutta Beher, Piero Visconti·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- Limited reciprocal surrogacy of bird and habitat diversity and inconsistencies in their representation in Romanian protected areas
J. Geue, P. J. Rotter, … H. A. Thomassen·bioRxiv·May 7, 2021
- A prioritization strategy for protecting Conservation Imperatives Sites
Joe Gosling, Eric Dinerstein, … Jasmin Upton·Frontiers in Conservation SciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2026
- Threatened terrestrial vertebrates are exposed to human pressures across 94% of Europe's protected land
D. M. Delsen, W. D. Kissling, J. R. Allan·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2020
- Prioritize diversity or declining species? Trade-offs and synergies in spatial planning for the conservation of migratory birds in the face of land cover change
S. Wilson, R. Schuster, … P. Arcese·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2019