Biological InvasionsEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
What is Known, Unknown, and Needed to be Known about Damage Caused by Wild Pigs
K. C. VerCauteren, K. Pepin, S. Cook, S. McKee, A. Pagels, K. Kohen, I. Messer, M. P. Glow, N. Snow
Abstract
Damage assessments provide evidence for initiating and evaluating management programs that protect natural resources and human livelihoods against invasive species. Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) cause extensive damage in their native and non-native ranges, but the extent of current damage and efficacy of management of the damage (i.e., population control of wild pigs, exclusion fencing, etc.) remains poorly described. We conducted a systematic review of physical damage caused by wild pigs to summarize what is known and identify knowledge gaps for damage assessment. Wild pig damage assessments have been overwhelmingly qualitative (84% of studies) and measured differently across studies, which prevents the determination of typical damage amounts to a particular resource and comparison across studies. Key priorities going forward are to standardize damage assessments quantitatively and measure population density (or index of such) of wild pigs concurrently with damage assessments to determine the relationship between damage and population levels. We provide a framework for inferring damage in new areas and assessing the benefits of management - to evaluate and optimize landscape-scale management programs. Overall, we recommend future studies strive for: 1) report the amount of damages in a standardized fashion (e.g., area damaged/area surveyed), 2) evaluate and report the amount of damage relative to the density of wild pigs, and 3) when reporting economic costs of damages incurred and management actions, describe the economic valuation method used along with the year of reference for the valuation. Capturing these elements are necessary steps to predict the benefits of management for an area with particular profile of resources and wild pig density, even in areas where damage assessments are not available. Meeting these criteria with allow for more generalizable results that can inform managers across the nearly global distribution of wild pigs
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effect of long-term management on wild pig (Sus scrofa x domesticus) populations across the southeastern United States
John R. Foster, Kim M. Pepin, Ryan S. Miller·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2026
- Evaluating Cost-Effective Methods for Rapid and Repeatable National Scale Detection and Mapping of Invasive Species Spread
R. A. Kost, R. Brook·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2018
- Improving a removal model for evaluating density changes in a widespread invasive species
John R. Foster, Kim M. Pepin, … Ryan S. Miller·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2025
- Comparing efficiencies of population control methods for responding to foreign animal disease threats in wild pigs
Nathan P. Snow, Benjamin Smith, … Kim M. Pepin·Preventive Veterinary MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2024
- The spatial distribution and temporal trends of livestock damages caused by wolves in Europe
L. Singer, X. Wietlisbach, … D. Wegmann·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2022
- Quantifying Spatio-Temporal Overlap of Invasive Wild Pigs and Domestic Pig Farms as a Proxy for Potential Disease Transmission Risk
R. K. Brook, R. Aschim·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2022