bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Genetic architectures of floral pigment and patterning in hybrid monkeyflowers
Arielle M. CooleyiD, Emily S. G. SimmonsiD, Caroline Schlutius, Melia Matthews, Xingyu ZhengiD, Daniel Churchill ThomasiD, Patrick P. EdgeriD, Adrian E. PlattsiD, Amy M. LaFountainiD, Logan George, Aaron Williams, Douglas Hundley, Greg Conradi Smith, Yao‐Wu YuaniD, Alex D. TwyfordiD, Joshua R. PuzeyiD
Abstract
Coloration in living organisms varies in hue, saturation, and pattern. Here we use genetic mapping to investigate all three elements in monkeyflowers Mimulus luteus var. variegatus and M. cupreus, whose flower petals differ in both yellow carotenoid and magenta anthocyanin pigmentation and whose hybrids exhibit anthocyanin pattern variation not seen in either parent. We report two QTLs associated with carotenoid intensity, and show that lighter yellow petals accumulate relatively high proportions of beta-carotene at the expense of downstream carotenoids. We propose that the derived loss of carotenoid saturation in M. l. variegatus is due to a function-reducing mutation in a Beta-Carotene Hydroxylase candidate gene, coupled with a reduction in the availability of carotenoid-storing chromoplasts influenced by the ORANGE candidate gene. We next identify five QTLs associated with the spatial patterning of anthocyanin pigment. Two QTLs, 9b and 23, each contain genes in the anthocyanin-activating subgroup of the MYB family. We hypothesize that MYB5a/NEGAN, at QTL-9b, activates spot formation in hybrids as part of a Turing-type reaction-diffusion system, while a MYB at QTL-23 activates solid, unpatterned anthocyanin pigment and may also be able to activate the variegatus allele of MYB5a/NEGAN. In addition to the apparently stochastic placement of most spots (consistent with a Turing mechanism), some pattern aspects - notably spots at the petal tips - appear to conform to a positional specification model in which spot location is predetermined. Collectively, this work begins to identify how combinations of yellow and red hues, shifts in carotenoid intensity, and two cryptic patterning systems all contribute to the complexity of color divergence between two close relatives.
- organism: plant (other)
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MYB5a/NEGAN activates petal anthocyanin pigmentation and shapes the MBW regulatory network in Mimulus luteusvar. variegatus
Xingyu Zheng, Kuenzang Om, … Arielle M. Cooley·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2021
- Coding-sequence evolution does not explain divergence in petal anthocyanin pigmentation between Mimulus luteus var. luteus and M. l. variegatus
Walker Symonds-Orr, Ji Yang Kim, … Arielle M. Cooley·Evolution & DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2024
- The genetic architecture of floral trait divergence between hummingbird- and self-pollinated monkeyflower (Mimulus) species
Hongfei Chen, Colette S. Berg, … Lila Fishman·New PhytologistPeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2024
- Maintenance of phenotypic divergence in two sympatric monkeyflowers with weak reproductive isolation
Henry Arenas‐Castro, Cage Cochran, … Jenn M. Coughlan·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2026
- A Tetratricopeptide Repeat Protein Regulates Carotenoid Biosynthesis and Chromoplast Development in Monkeyflowers (Mimulus)
Lauren E. Stanley, Baoqing Ding, … Yao‐Wu Yuan·The Plant CellPeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2020
- Ancient hybridization leads to the repeated evolution of red flowers across a monkeyflower radiation
A. W. Short, M. A. Streisfeld·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2023