Nature CommunicationsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Distinct value computations support rapid sequential decisions
Andrew MahiD, Shannon Sandra SchiereckiD, Veronica Bossio, Christine M. ConstantinopleiD
Abstract
The value of the environment determines animals motivational states and sets expectations for error-based learning1-3. How are values computed? Rein-forcement learning systems can store or "cache" values of states or actions that are learned from experience, or they can compute values using a model of the environment to simulate possible futures3. These value computations have distinct trade-offs, and a central question is how neural systems decide which computations to use or whether/how to combine them4-8. Here we show that rats use distinct value computations for sequential decisions within single tri-als. We used high-throughput training to collect statistically powerful datasets from 291 rats performing a temporal wagering task with hidden reward states. Rats adjusted how quickly they initiated trials and how long they waited for re-wards across states, balancing effort and time costs against expected rewards. Statistical modeling revealed that animals computed the value of the environ-ment differently when initiating trials versus when deciding how long to wait for rewards, even though these decisions were only seconds apart. Moreover, value estimates interacted via a dynamic learning rate. Our results reveal how distinct value computations interact on rapid timescales, and demonstrate the power of using high-throughput training to understand rich, cognitive behav-iors.
- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rats strategically manage learning during perceptual decision making
Javier Alejandro Masis, Travis Chapman, … Andrew Saxe·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2020
- Integrating reward information for prospective behaviour
Sam Hall-McMaster, Mark G. Stokes, Nicholas E. Myers·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2022
- Humans forage for reward in reinforcement learning tasks
Meriam Zid, Veldon-James Laurie, … R. Becket Ebitz·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2024
- Computational mechanisms underlying motivation to earn symbolic reinforcers
Diana C. Burk, Craig A Taswell, … Bruno B. Averbeck·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2024
- Time elapsed between choices in a probabilistic task correlates with repeating the same decision.
J. M. Jablonska, L. Szumiec, … J. Rodriguez Parkitna·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2020
- Common attentional mechanisms, but distinct computational dynamics, across Statistical and Reward Learning
Carola Dolci, Tom Verguts, … Nico Boehler·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2026