bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Reward-specific satiety affects subjective value signals in orbitofrontal cortex during multi-component economic choice
Alexandre Pastor‐BernieriD, Arkadiusz StasiakiD, Wolfram SchultziD
Abstract
Sensitivity to satiety constitutes a basic requirement for neuronal coding of subjective reward value. Satiety from natural on-going consumption affects reward functions in learning and approach behavior. More specifically, satiety reduces the subjective economic value of individual rewards during choice between options that typically contain multiple reward components. The unconfounded assessment of economic reward value requires tests at choice indifference between two options, which is difficult to achieve with sated rewards. By conceptualizing choices between options with multiple reward components ( bundles), Revealed Preference Theory may offer a solution. Despite satiety, choices against an unaltered reference bundle may remain indifferent when the reduced value of a sated bundle reward is compensated by larger amounts of an unsated reward of the same bundle; then the value loss of the sated reward is indicated by the amount of the added unsated reward. Here we show psychophysically titrated choice indifference in monkeys between bundles of differently sated rewards. Neuronal chosen value signals in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) followed closely the subjective value change within recording periods of individual neurons. A neuronal classifier distinguishing the bundles and predicting choice substantiated the subjective value change. Choice between conventional single rewards confirmed the neuronal changes seen with two-reward bundles. Thus, reward-specific satiety reduces subjective reward value signals in OFC. With satiety being an important factor of subjective reward value, these results extend the notion of subjective economic reward value coding in OFC neurons. SignificanceOn-going consumption reduces the subjective value of rewards to different degrees depending on their individual properties, a phenomenon referred to as sensory-specific satiety. Such value change should be manifested in economic choices, and neuronal signals for subjective economic reward value should be sensitive to reward-specific satiety. We tested monkeys during choice between two options that each contained two different rewards ( bundles); the two rewards were prone to different degrees of satiety. On-going reward consumption affected choices in a way that indicated satiety-induced reward-specific change of subjective economic value. Neuronal responses in the monkey orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) followed the differential reduction of subjective economic value. These results satisfy a crucial requirement for subjective reward value coding in OFC neurons.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reliable population signal of subjective economic value from unreliable neurons in primate orbitofrontal cortex
Simone Ferrari-Toniolo, Wolfram Schultz·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2021
- Values Encoded in Orbitofrontal Cortex Are Causally Related to Economic Choices
Sébastien Ballesta, Weikang Shi, … Camillo Padoa‐Schioppa·NaturePeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2020
- Neuronal Activity in Orbitofrontal Cortex during Trinary Choices under Risk
Miguel Barretto García, Jiaxin Cindy Tu, Camillo Padoa‐Schioppa·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2026
- Orbitofrontal cortex contributes to the comparison of values underlying economic choices
Sébastien Ballesta, Weikang Shi, Camillo Padoa‐Schioppa·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2022
- Changes in subjective preference do not require dopamine signaling or the orbital frontal cortex
Merridee J. Lefner, Alexa P. Magnon, … Matthew J. Wanat·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2019
- Neuronal Adaptation to the Value Range in Macaque Orbitofrontal Cortex
Katherine E. Conen, Camillo Padoa‐Schioppa·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2019