bioRxivEcologyPreprint
The bind of the burrow: space use is dominated by selection for burrow habitat over foraging habitat in an arid-adapted carnivore
Jack Benjamin ThorleyiD, Chris Duncan, Annika HerdtleiD, Marta B. ManseriD, Dominic L. CramiD, Tim Clutton-BrockiD
Abstract
Our understanding of habitat selection in wild vertebrates has been heavily influenced by observations of preferred foraging areas. However, foraging is only one of many ways animals interact with their environment, and preferences for habitat features that support resting, breeding, and safety, along with trade-offs between these needs, remain underexplored. These trade-offs are likely to be particularly acute in complex environments where these needs are met in different locations. Using a long-term dataset of movements and life history, we examine how preferences for foraging areas and burrow sites shape space use in Kalahari meerkats (Suricata suricatta). Meerkats cannot dig new sleeping and breeding burrows and must use those abandoned by other species, potentially generating trade-offs in daily space use if overnight refuges are far from optimal foraging areas. We find that space use is strongly anchored by burrow location, with burrows in calcareous pans and dry riverbed ("white sand") habitat being preferred year-round and showing lower burrow switching rates. However, white sand areas were not preferred for foraging, and yielded lower weight gains, particularly during the dry season. As a result, meerkats faced a trade-off between optimal burrow locations and productive foraging grounds, as indicated by faster, longer, and more energetically costly travel when moving through or waking up in white sands. Our results suggest that changes in the distribution or abundance of key burrow-constructing species in desert environments may have cascading effects on the many secondary burrow-using species that depend on them for survival and reproduction. More broadly, our results highlight that limited refuge availability across the landscape can impose strong ecological constraints on animals and may restrict behavioural plasticity under environmental change, particularly if productive foraging areas shift.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatial position relative to group members affects weight gain in meerkats (Suricata suricatta)
Rasekuwane Mosia, Vlad Demartsev, … Lily Johnson-Ulrich·Animal BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2025
- Social anchors: how previous social locations shape current animal movement and habitat selection
Jillian M. Kusch, Jack Hendrix, … Eric Vander Wal·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2026
- Prey-Driven Behavioral Habitat Use in a Low-Energy Ambush Predator
A. M. Tutterow, A. S. Hoffman, … W. E. Peterman·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2020
- Which food patches are worth exploring? Foraging desert birds do not follow environmental indicators of seed abundance at small scales: a field experiment
F. A. Milesi, J. Lopez de Casenave, V. R. Cueto·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2018
- Accounting for central place foraging constraints in habitat selection studies
S. Benhamou, N. Courbin·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2022
- Resource selection by the Endangered Arabian tahr: identifying critical habitats for conservation and climate change adaptation.
S. Ross, H. Al Rawahi, M. H. Al Jahdhami·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2021