henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Predicting Growth and Carcass Traits in Swine Using Metagenomic Data and Machine Learning Algorithms

Christian MalteccaiD, Duc LuiD, Constantino Schillebeeckx, Nathan P. McNultyiD, Clint Ray Schwab, Caleb M Shull, Francesco TiezziiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluated the power of metagenome measures taken at three time points over the growth test period (weaning, 15 and 22 weeks) to foretell growth and carcass traits in 1039 individuals of a line of crossbred pigs. We measured prediction accuracy as the correlation between actual and predicted phenotypes in a five-fold cross-validation setting. Phenotypic traits measured included live weight measures and carcass composition obtained during the trial as well as at slaughter. We employed a null model excluding microbiome information as a baseline to assess the increase in prediction accuracy stemming from the inclusion of operational taxonomic units (OTU) as predictors. We further contrasted performance of models from the Bayesian alphabet (Bayesian Lasso) as well machine learning approaches (Random Forest and Gradient Boosting) and semi-parametric kernel models (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert space). In most cases, prediction accuracy increased significantly with the inclusion of microbiome data. Accuracy was more substantial with the inclusion of metagenomic information taken at week 15 and 22, with values ranging from approximately 0.30 for loin traits to more than 0.50 for back-fat. Conversely, microbiome composition at weaning resulted in most cases in marginal gains of prediction accuracy, suggesting that later measures might be more useful to include in predictive models. Model choice affected predictions marginally with no clear winner for any model/trait/time point. We, therefore, suggest average prediction across models as a robust strategy in fitting metagenomic information. In conclusion, microbiome composition can effectively be used as a predictor of growth and composition traits, particularly for fatness traits. The inclusion of OTU predictors could potentially be used to promote fast growth of individuals while limiting fat accumulation. Early microbiome measures might not be good predictors of growth and OTU information might be best collected at later life stages. Future research should focus on the inclusion of both microbiome as well as host genome information in predictions, as well as the interaction between the two. Furthermore, the influence of microbiome on feed efficiency as well as carcass and meat quality should be investigated.

Citations
90
FWCI
6.31
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKhanal '20Roddur '26Barman '23Holman '22Dong '24Luise '19
72% semantic matchGenomics
Piush Khanal, Christian Maltecca, Clint Ray Schwab+2 more·Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics·Sep 26, 2020· 57 citations