Journal of Neural EngineeringBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
The Speech Reception Threshold Can be Estimated Using EEG Electrodes In and Around the Ear
Heidi Bliddal BorgesiD, Johannes ZaariD, Emina AličkovićiD, Christian Bech ChristenseniD, Preben KidmoseiD
Abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSPrevious studies have demonstrated that the speech reception threshold (SRT) can be estimated using scalp electroencephalography (EEG), referred to as SRTneuro. The present study assesses the feasibility of using ear-EEG, which allows for discreet measurement of neural activity from in and around the ear, to estimate the SRTneuro. Such an estimate can be highly useful e.g. for continuously adjusting noise-reduction algorithms in hearing aids or for logging the SRT in the users natural environment. ApproachTwenty young normal-hearing participants listened to audiobook excerpts at varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) whilst wearing a 66-channel EEG cap and 12 ear-EEG electrodes. A linear decoder was trained on different electrode configurations to estimate the envelope of the audio excerpts from the EEG recordings. The reconstruction accuracy was determined by calculating the Pearsons correlation between the actual and the estimated envelope. A sigmoid function was then fitted to the reconstruction-accuracy-vs-SNR data points, with the midpoint of the sigmoid serving as the SRTneuro estimate for each participant. Main resultsUsing only in-ear electrodes, the estimated SRTneuro was within 3 dB of the behaviorally measured SRT (SRTbeh) for 6 out of 20 participants (30%). With electrodes placed both in and around the ear, the SRTneuro was within 3 dB of the SRTbeh for 19 out of 20 participants (95%) and thus on par with the reference estimate obtained from full-scalp EEG. Using only electrodes in and around the ear from the right side of the head, the SRTneuro remained within 3 dB of the SRTbeh for 19 out of 20 participants. SignificanceThese findings suggest that the SRTneuro can be reliably estimated using ear-EEG, especially when combining in-ear electrodes and around-the-ear electrodes.
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Speech-reception-threshold estimation via EEG-based continuous speech envelope reconstruction
Heidi Bliddal Borges, Johannes Zaar, … Preben Kidmose·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2025
- Comparing neurophysiological correlates of speech-in-noise perception across MEG, EEG and ear-EEG
Till Habersetzer, Andreas Radeloff, Bernd T. Meyer·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026
- Predicting individual speech intelligibility from the neural tracking of acoustic- and phonetic-level speech representations
Damien Lesenfants, Jonas Vanthornhout, … Tom Francart·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2019
- Effect of number and placement of EEG electrodes onmeasurement of neural tracking of speech
Jair Montoya-Martínez, Jonas Vanthornhout, … Tom Francart·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2021
- Extending Subcortical EEG Responses to Continuous Speech to the Sound-Field
Florine L. Bachmann, Joshua P. Kulasingham, … Hamish Innes-Brown·Trends in HearingPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Hearing impairment is associated with enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope
Lien P. Decruy, Jonas Vanthornhout, Tom Francart·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2020