bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
The Readability Of Scientific Texts Is DecreasingOver Time
P. Plaven-Sigray, G. J. Matheson, B. C. Schiffler, W. H. Thompson
Abstract
Clarity and accuracy of reporting are fundamental to the scientific process. The understandability of written language can be estimated using readability formulae. Here, in a corpus consisting of 707 452 scientific abstracts published between 1881 and 2015 from 122 influential biomedical journals, we show that the readability of science is steadily decreasing. Further, we demonstrate that this trend is indicative of a growing usage of general scientific jargon. These results are concerning for scientists and for the wider public, as they impact both the reproducibility and accessibility of research findings.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Specialized terminology limits the reach of new scientific knowledge
A. Martinez, S. Mammola·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2020
- Accelerating Scientific Publication in Biology
Ronald D Vale·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2015
- Rigor and Transparency Index, a new metric of quality for assessing biological and medical science methods.
J. Menke, M. Roelandse, … A. E. Bandrowski·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2020
- Science should be machine-readable
A. Sina Booeshaghi, Laura Luebbert, Lior S. Pachter·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2026
- Expansion of information in scientific research papers
M. Abdullaeva, J. J. Bromfield, I. M. Sheldon·bioRxiv·May 6, 2022
- On the quest for novelty in ecology
G. Ottaviani, A. Martinez, … S. Mammola·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2023