bioRxivNeuroscience
Capturing the dynamics of peripersonal space by integrating sound propagation properties and expectancy effects
Lise HobeikaiD, Marine TaffouiD, Thibaut Carpentier, Olivier WarusfeliD, Isabelle Viaud‐DelmoniD
Abstract
HighlightsO_LILogarithmically distributed auditory distances provides an apt granularity of PPS\nC_LIO_LIMeasuring expectation helps to interpret behavioral impact of audiotactile integration\nC_LIO_LITactile RTs follows a logarithmic decrease due to audiotactile integration\nC_LIO_LIPeripersonal space is better characterized and quantified with this refinement\nC_LI\n\nBackgroundHumans perceive near space and far space differently. Peripersonal space, i.e. the space directly surrounding the body, is often studied using paradigms based on auditory-tactile integration. In these paradigms, reaction time to a tactile stimulus is measured in the presence of a concurrent auditory looming stimulus.\n\nNew MethodWe propose here to refine the experimental procedure considering sound propagation properties in order to improve granularity and relevance of auditory-tactile integration measures. We used a logarithmic distribution of distances for this purpose. We also want to disentangle behavioral contributions of the targeted audiotactile integration mechanisms from expectancy effects. To this aim, we added to the protocol a baseline with a fixed sound distance.\n\nResultsExpectation contributed significantly to overall behavioral responses. Subtracting it isolated the audiotactile effect due to the stimulus proximity. This revealed that audiotactile integration effects have to be tested on a logarithmic scale of distances, and that they follow a linear variation on this scale.\n\nComparison with Existing Method(s)The granularity of the current method is more relevant, providing higher spatial resolution in the vicinity of the body. Furthermore, most of the existing methods propose a sigmoid fitting, which rests on the intuitive framework that PPS is an in-or-out zone. Our results suggest that behavioral effects follow a logarithmic decrease, thus a response graduated in space.\n\nConclusionsThe proposed protocol design and method of analysis contribute to refine the experimental investigation of the factors influencing and modifying multisensory integration phenomena in the space surrounding the body.
- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Motor Planning Sensitivity to Affective Looming Sounds Within The Peri-personal Space: An Interplay of Exogenous and Endogenous Influences
Roberto Barumerli, Michele Geronazzo, Paola Cesari·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2025
- Tactile and Visual Spatial Frequency Perception Follows Optimal Integration but Is Not Affected by Spatial Proximity
Guandong Wang, David Alais·bioRxiv·May 27, 2025
- Audio-tactile and peripersonal space processing around the trunk in human parietal and temporal cortex: an intracranial EEG study
Fosco Bernasconi, Jean‐Paul Noel, … Andrea Serino·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Jun 14, 2018
- Distinct neural mechanisms and temporal constraints govern a cascade of audiotactile interactions
Johanna M. Zumer, Thomas P. White, Uta Noppeney·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2019
- Action Planning and Affective States Within the Auditory Peripersonal Space.
Mehrdad Bahadori, Roberto Barumerli, … Paola Cesari·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2020
- Patterns of multisensory facilitation distinguish peripersonal from reaching space
Alessandro Zanini, Ivan Patané, … Claudio Brozzoli·Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2021