Frontiers in Behavioral NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Not seeing the forest for the trees: Combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation
Jonas SchereriD, Martin M. MülleriD, Patrick UnterbrinkiD, Sina Meier, Martin EgelhaafiD, Olivier J. N. BertrandiD, Norbert BoeddekeriD
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Field percentile
- top 32%
Abstract
IntroductionIn order to successfully move from place to place, our brain often combines sensory inputs from various sources by dynamically weighting spatial cues according to their reliability and relevance for a given task. Two of the most important cues in navigation are the spatial arrangement of landmarks in the environment, and the continuous path integration of travelled distances and changes in direction. Several studies have shown that Bayesian integration of cues provides a good explanation for navigation in environments dominated by small numbers of easily identifiable landmarks. However, it remains largely unclear how cues are combined in more complex environments. MethodsTo investigate how humans process and combine landmarks and path integration in complex environments, we conducted a series of triangle completion experiments in virtual reality, in which we varied the number of landmarks from an open steppe to a dense forest, thus going beyond the spatially simple environments that have been studied in the past. We analysed spatial behaviour at both the population and individual level with linear regression models and developed a computational model, based on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), to infer the underlying combination of cues. ResultsOverall homing performance was optimal in an environment containing three landmarks arranged around the goal location. With more than three landmarks, individual differences between participants in the use of cues are striking. For some, the addition of landmarks does not worsen their performance, whereas for others it seems to impair their use of landmark information. DiscussionIt appears that navigation success in complex environments depends on the ability to identify the correct clearing around the goal location, suggesting that some participants may not be able to see the forest for the trees.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Embodied Navigation: whole-body movement drives path integration in large-scale free-walking virtual reality
Jonas Scherer, Anabel Kroehnert, … Norbert Boeddeker·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2025
- Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction
Sevan K. Harootonian, Arne D. Ekstrom, Robert C. Wilson·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2022
- Influence of sensory modality and control dynamics on human path integration
Akis Stavropoulos, Kaushik J. Lakshminarasimhan, … Dora E. Angelaki·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2021
- Competition and integration of visual and goal vector signals for spatial navigation
Sandhiya Vijayabaskaran, Sen Cheng·bioRxiv·May 14, 2024
- Path integration in large-scale space and with novel geometries: Comparing Vector Addition and Encoding-Error Models
S. Harootonian, R. C. Wilson, … A. Ekstrom·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2019
- Distinct algorithms for combining landmarks and path integration in medial entorhinal, visual andretrosplenial cortex
Malcolm G. Campbell, Alexander Attinger, … Lisa Marie Giocomo·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2020