bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Defensive mutualisms affect plant and ant island biogeography at a global scale
Abstract
AimMutualism can shape biogeographic patterns at macroecological scales. Recently, Delavaux et al. (2024) found that plant mutualisms with mycorrhizae, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and animal pollinators limit island colonization, weakening the latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) on oceanic islands. Here, we revisit their analysis and examine whether ants and plants engaged in a common defensive mutualism mediated by extrafloral nectaries (EFN) are similarly under-represented on oceanic islands, and whether this defensive ant-plant mutualism also weakens the LDG on islands. LocationGlobal. Time periodPresent-day species distributions and traits. Major taxa studiedVascular plants and ants. MethodsWe used global trait and occurrence databases to compare ant and plant species richness between oceanic islands and their likely source mainlands for taxa that do and do not interact mutualistically via EFNs. When analyzing the factors that determine whether a plant species occurs on oceanic islands, we also included the mutualism types studied by Delavaux et al. (2024), namely biotic pollination, mycorrhizal fungi, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and added plant habit, life history, and phylogeny as covariates. ResultsBoth plants with EFNs and EFN-visiting ants are significantly over-represented on islands. The species richness of EFN-visiting ants and EFN-bearing plants also positively covary across islands. In ants, engaging in mutualisms mediated by EFNs significantly strengthens, rather than weakens, the LDG on islands, while for plants, EFNs have no effect or strengthen the LDG on islands, depending on data filtering. After accounting for plant habit, life history, and phylogeny, only biotic pollination significantly limits plant colonization of islands, whereas mycorrhizae and nitrogen-fixing bacteria now have positive or non-significant effects, respectively, on island colonization. Main conclusionsEFNs facilitate rather than limit plant and ant colonization on islands. Mutualism does not ubiquitously limit island colonization, and some mutualism types strengthen rather than dampen the LDG on islands.
- organism: plant (other)
- organism: virus
- assay: metagenomics
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Climate and ant richness explain the global distribution of ant-plant mutualisms
- Generalized mutualisms promote range expansion in both plant and ant partners
P. Nathan, B. Guenard, … M. Frederickson·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2023
- Are ant-plant mutualisms stronger at lower latitudes? A case study using the castor plant in the Indian subcontinent
Pooja Nathan, Arshyaan Shahid, … Megan E. Frederickson·OecologiaPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2025
- MUTUALISMS ALTER LEGUME NICHES AT A GLOBAL SCALE
Erin McHugh, Megan Bontrager, Megan E. Frederickson·bioRxiv·May 29, 2026
- Are island plants really poorly defended? No support for the loss of defense hypothesis in domatia-bearing plants
M. Biddick·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2021
- Cooperate-and-radiate co-evolution between ants and plants
K. M. Kaur, P.-J. G. Male, … M. E. Frederickson·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2018