Nature ProtocolsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Quality assessment and control of unprocessed anatomical, functional, and diffusion MRI of the human brain using MRIQC
McKenzie Paige HageniD, Céline ProvinsiD, Eilidh MacNicoliD, Jamie K. LiiD, Teresa GomeziD, Mélanie GarciaiD, Saren H. SeeleyiD, Jon Haitz LegarretaiD, Martin NørgaardiD, Patrick G. BissettiD, Russell Alan PoldrackiD, Ariel RokemiD, Oscar EstébaniD
Abstract
Quality control of MRI data prior to preprocessing is fundamental, as substandard data are known to increase variability spuriously. Currently, no automated or manual method reliably identifies subpar images, given pre-specified exclusion criteria. In this work, we propose a protocol describing how to carry out the visual assessment of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, functional, and diffusion MRI scans of the human brain with the visual reports generated by MRIQC. The protocol describes how to execute the software on all the images of the input dataset using typical research settings (i.e., a high-performance computing cluster). We then describe how to screen the visual reports generated with MRIQC to identify artifacts and potential quality issues and annotate the latter with the "rating widget" - a utility that enables rapid annotation and minimizes bookkeeping errors. Integrating proper quality control checks on the unprocessed data is fundamental to producing reliable statistical results and crucial to identifying faults in the scanning settings, preempting the acquisition of large datasets with persistent artifacts that should have been addressed as they emerged. RELATED LINKSO_ST_ABSKey reference(s) using this protocolC_ST_ABSEsteban, O. et al. (2017), PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184661. [10.1371/journal.pone.0184661] Esteban, O. et al. (2019), Sci Data 6, 30. [10.1038/s41597-019-0035-4] Esteban, O. et al. (2020), Nat Prot 15, 2186-2202. [10.1038/s41596-020-0327-3] Provins, C. et al. (2023), Front. Neuroinform. 1, 2813-1193. [10.3389/fnimg.2022.1073734] Bissett P. et al. (2024) Sci Data 11: 809. [10.1038/s41597-024-03636-y] Key data used in this protocolAmsterdam Open MRI Collection: Population Imaging of Psychology1 (AOMIC-PIOP1; ds002785 [https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds002785]).
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Crowdsourced MRI quality metrics and expert quality annotations for training of humans and machines
O. Esteban, R. W. Blair, … K. J. Gorgolewski·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2019
- MRIQC: Advancing the Automatic Prediction of Image Quality in MRI from Unseen Sites
Oscar Estéban, Daniel Birman, … Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2017
- MRIQC Web-API: Crowdsourcing image quality metrics and expert quality ratings of structural and functional MRI
Oscar Estéban, Ross Blair, … Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2017
- The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Segmentation-Based Quality Control of Structural Magnetic Resonance Images
Robert Dahnke, Polona Kalc, … Christian Gaser B·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2025
- Restoring statistical validity in group analyses of motion-corrupted MRI data
Antoine Lutti, Nadège Corbin, … Giulia Di Domenicantonio·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2022
- Fast qualitY conTrol meThod foR derIved diffUsion Metrics (YTTRIUM) in big data analysis: UK Biobank 18608 example
Ivan I. Maximov, Dennis van der Meer, … Lars Tjelta Westlye·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2021