Physical review. EEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Phase transitions and symmetry breaking of cooperation on lattices
Abstract
The donation game is an instance of a social dilemma with a single parameter given by the cost-to-benefit ratio of cooperation, r. In spatial settings limited local interactions and clustering are capable of supporting cooperation by reducing exploitation from defectors. Traditionally the interaction and competition neighbourhoods are identical. Here we discuss intriguing differences in the dynamics that arise when separating the neighbourhoods. On the square lattice disjoint interaction and competition neighbourhoods are easily realized by considering nearest neighbour interactions and second nearest neighbour competition. Incidentally, the number of first and second neighbours is the same. More importantly, this separates the population into two competing sub-populations, with interactions solely between sub-populations but competition within sub-populations. For negative cost-to-benefit ratios, r, the donation game turns into a harmony game and defection becomes an act of spite. In the traditional setup the extinction of cooperators under harsh conditions, large r, and that of spiteful defectors, r < 0, exhibits critical phase transitions with characteristics of directed percolation. In contrast, with two sub-populations spiteful behaviour cannot persist, while the extinction of cooperators exhibits the same characteristics. Most intriguingly, however, for smaller r spontaneous symmetry breaking in the levels of cooperation between the two sub-populations is observed. The symmetry breaking resembles the sub-lattice ordering occurring in the anti-ferromagnetic Ising model. Within the twofold degenerated phases, decreasing the cost-to-benefit ratio induces extremely large fluctuations (bursts) in the frequencies of cooperation. These bursts eventually drive the system into one of the absorbing states: occasionally homogeneous defection in both sub-lattices but usually only in one and homogeneous cooperation in the other, achieving perfect asymmetry. PACS numbers89.65.-s, 89.75.Fb, 87.23.Kg
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spontaneous symmetry breaking of cooperation between species
Christoph Hauert, György Szabó·PNAS NexusPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2024
- Second-order freeriding on antisocial punishment restores the effectiveness of prosocial punishment
A. Szolnoki, M. Perc·Physical Review XPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2017
- Threshold public goods game in well mixed populations: Cooperation in density independent and density dependent cases
A. Karolyi, I. Scheuring·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2023
- How strategy environment and wealth shape altruistic behaviour: Cooperation rules affecting wealth distribution in dynamic networks
S. Pathak, P. Verma, … S. Sengupta·bioRxiv·May 5, 2020
- How multilevel competition drives cooperation in stigmergic systems
Thomas Bassanetti, Ramon Escobedo, … Guy Theraulaz·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2026
- Continuous dynamics of cooperation and competition in social decision-making
Darius Lewen, Vladyslav Ivanov, … Igor Kagan·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2025