henhaobio
Sign in

PLoS ONEGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Near-infrared spectroscopy outperforms genomic selection for predicting sugarcane feedstock quality traits

Mateus Teles Vital GonçalvesiD, Gota MorotaiD, Paulo Mafra de Almeida CostaiD, Pedro Marcus Pereira VidigaliD, Márcio Henrique Pereira BarbosaiD, Luíz Alexandre PeternelliiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the prediction performance of genomic and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) data and whether the integration of genomic and NIR predictor variables can increase the prediction accuracy of two feedstock quality traits (fiber and sucrose content) in a sugarcane population (Saccharum spp.). The following three modeling strategies were compared: M1 (genome-based prediction), M2 (NIR-based prediction), and M3 (integration of genomics s and NIR wavenumbers). Data were collected from a commercial population comprised of three hundred and eighty-five individuals, genotyped for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and screened using NIR spectroscopy. We compared partial least squares (PLS) and BayesB regression methods to estimate marker and wavenumber effects. In order to assess model performance, we employed random sub-sampling cross-validation to calculate the mean Pearson correlation coefficient between observed and predicted genotypic values. Our results showed that models fitted using BayesB were most predictive than PLS models. We found that NIR (M2) provided the highest prediction accuracy, whereas genomics (M1) presented the lowest predictive ability, regardless of the measured traits and regression methods used. The integration of predictors derived from NIR spectroscopy and genomics into a single model (M3) did not significantly improve the prediction accuracy for the two traits evaluated. These findings suggest that NIR-based prediction can be an effective strategy for predicting the genotypic value of sugarcane clones.

Citations
37
FWCI
3.00
Field percentile
top 9%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDeSalvio '23Wang '20Graciano '25Hershberger '21Bienvenu '25Aono '20
71% semantic matchPlant Biology
A. J. DeSalvio, A. Adak, S. C. Murray+4 more·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2023