henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivPlant BiologyPreprint

DREM: integrating resistance and domain probabilities to prioritize plant immune receptors

Rita DublinoiD, Vincenzo Carandente, Giancarlo SperlíiD, Mara Ercolano

PDFDOI

Abstract

Plant resistance (R) genes, key players in the immune system, have traditionally been identified with HMM-based tools relying on sequence homology, whose sensitivity decreases for divergent or non-canonical resistance proteins. Here, DREM (Deep Resistance gene Evaluator Model) is presented as a deep learning framework that learns the compositional properties of resistance proteins from sequence alone rather than searching for predefined motifs. The framework combines two bidirectional long short-term memory networks with attention: a binary resistance classifier and a multi-label classifier of resistance domains. Validation on experimentally characterized proteins from RefPlantNLR recovered 99.8% of sequences, and on 15,000 held-out proteins DREM outperformed the deep learning predictor PRGminer (Matthews correlation coefficient 0.938 vs 0.820), with about two-thirds fewer classification errors. Across five plant proteomes, DREM identified 4,046 High Confidence or Candidate proteins; canonical domain architecture was confirmed in 75.5%, whereas 992 carried strong DREM signals without detectable Pfam domains, and 54 of 55 characterized nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) loci ranked within the top 1.7% of their proteomes. Unlike domain-gated pipelines such as R-Predictor, DREM also recovered experimentally validated atypical NLRs, RPW8 proteins and non-receptor resistance genes. Attention did not concentrate on canonical ATP-binding motifs, consistent with the model drawing on sequence information beyond conserved domain signatures. Lightweight and applicable to complete proteomes, DREM complements domain-based annotation with a calibrated ranking. It links genome-wide prediction to the selection of resistance genes for functional validation, including atypical receptors missed by profile-based tools.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.