bioRxivEcologyPreprint
An operational framework to map Essential Life Support Areas (ELSAs) for biodiversity, climate, and sustainable development
Oscar VenteriD, Jamison Ervin, Anne Lucy Stilger VirnigiD, Scott AtkinsoniD, Marion Marigo, Di ZhangiD, Christina Supples, Enrique Paniagua, Lea Phillips, Richard H. SchusteriD, Xavier Corredor LlanoiD, Genevieve Q. K. PenceiD, Peter ArceseiD, Luizmar de Assis BarrosiD, Aray Belgubaeva, Daniel BorjaiD, Steve Brumby, Neil D. BurgessiD, Leticia CardozoiD, Carlos Cordero Vega, Maria Veronica Cordova, Liliana Corzo, Esteban Delgado-Altamirano, Claudia Fonseca, Edward T. GameiD, , James E. M. WatsoniD
- Citations
- 3
Abstract
Almost all countries are making increasingly bold commitments to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, minimise the impacts of climate change, and transition to more sustainable development. The effective achievement of many of these commitments relies on integrated spatial planning frameworks that are adaptable to national circumstances, priorities and capabilities. This need is formally recognized by Target 1 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), which specifies that all areas should be under such planning. Here, we describe the development and application of an operational framework for national-level integrated spatial planning: Essential Life Support Areas (ELSAs). This framework facilitates the identification of areas that - if protected, restored, or sustainably managed - can support the achievement of national commitments to biodiversity, climate, and sustainable development. The process of mapping ELSAs relies heavily on leadership by national experts and stakeholders and the integration of spatial data using systematic conservation planning tools. We showcase the ELSA process carried out for Ecuador, where the use of real-time scenario analyses enabled diverse stakeholder groups to collaborate to assess national priorities for nature, climate, and sustainable development, view trade-offs and synergies, and arrive at a spatial plan to guide national action. ELSA presented an actionable approach for Ecuador, and 12 other pilot countries, to create a spatial plan aimed at fulfilling their national and international commitments to nature, including to the GBF.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An operational methodology to identify Critical Ecosystem Areas to help nations achieve the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
R. Venegas Li, H. Grantham, … J. E. Watson·bioRxiv·May 3, 2023
- Limiting the loss of terrestrial ecosystems to safeguard nature for biodiversity and humanity
J. S. Simmonds, A. F. Suarez-Castro, … M. Maron·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2021
- One cannot have it all: trading-off ecosystem services and biodiversity bundles in landscape connectivity restoration
Margot Neyret, Daniel Rex Richards, … Sandra Lavorel·Biological ConservationPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2024
- Multi-scale planning helps resolve global conservation needs with regional priorities
D. S. Rinnan, Y. Sica, … W. Jetz·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2020
- Evaluating the likelihood for areas important for conservation to be recognized as Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures
C. Cook, M. Rao, … H. Grantham·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2024
- Prioritizing landscapes to reconcile biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, and human well-being in India
A. Srivathsa, D. Vasudev, … U. Ramakrishnan·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2022