bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership
Abstract
Understanding the growth of open access (OA) is important for deciding funder policy, subscription allocation, and infrastructure planning. This study analyses the number of papers available as OA over time. The models includes both OA embargo data and the relative growth rates of different OA types over time, based on the OA status of 70 million journal articles published between 1950 and 2019. The study also looks at article usage data, analyzing the proportion of views to OA articles vs views to articles which are closed access. Signal processing techniques are used to model how these viewership patterns change over time. Viewership data is based on 2.8 million uses of the Unpaywall browser extension in July 2019. We found that Green, Gold, and Hybrid papers receive more views than their Closed or Bronze counterparts, particularly Green papers made available within a year of publication. We also found that the proportion of Green, Gold, and Hybrid articles is growing most quickly. In 2019: O_LI31% of all journal articles are available as OA C_LIO_LI52% of article views are to OA articles C_LI Given existing trends, we estimate that by 2025: O_LI44% of all journal articles will be available as OA C_LIO_LI70% of article views will be to OA articles C_LI The declining relevance of closed access articles is likely to change the landscape of scholarly communication in the years to come. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=65 SRC="FIGDIR/small/795310v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d1e959org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12f08d8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@eddc16org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c4fcf_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Percent of views, by OA type: O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=38 SRC="FIGDIR/small/795310v1_ufig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (6K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4ba951org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1591fa9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2dbafforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4fbb70_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Percent of papers, by OA type: O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=51 SRC="FIGDIR/small/795310v1_ufig3.gif" ALT="Figure 3"> View larger version (6K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9ad3f8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d26405org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a49b40org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cc9b98_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Open Access publishing in Medicine: lights and shadows.
N. Bernabo, L. Valbonetti, … B. Barboni·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2021
- Only two out of five articles by New Zealand researchers are free-to-access: a multiple API study of access, citations, cost of Article Processing Charges (APC), and the potential to increase the proportion of open access
R. K. A. White, A. Angelo, … B. D. White·PeerJPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2021
- Middle-income countries disproportionately face the burden of the Open Access publication model
Imran Samad, Divyashree Rana·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2025
- Benchmarking of open access publication rates for the pharmaceutical industry and research-intensive academic institutions: development and demonstration of a live, open monitoring tool
Tomas Rees, Valérie Philippon, … T. J. Koder·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2024
- Looking into Pandora’s Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage
B. Greshake·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2017
- Open Access and Altmetrics in the pandemic age: Forescast analysis on COVID-19 related literature
D. Torres-Salinas, N. Robinson-Garcia, P. A. Castillo-Valdivieso·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2020