NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Faces and voices in the brain: a modality-general person-identity representation in superior temporal sulcus
Maria TsantaniiD, Nikolaus KriegeskorteiD, Carolyn McGettiganiD, Lúcia GarridoiD
Abstract
Face-selective and voice-selective brain regions have been shown to represent face-identity and voice-identity, respectively. Here we investigated whether there are modality-general person-identity representations in the brain that can be driven by either a face or a voice, and that invariantly represent naturalistically varying face and voice tokens of the same identity. According to two distinct models, such representations could exist either in multimodal brain regions (Campanella and Belin, 2007) or in face-selective brain regions via direct coupling between face- and voice-selective regions (von Kriegstein et al., 2005). To test the predictions of these two models, we used fMRI to measure brain activity patterns elicited by the faces and voices of familiar people in multimodal, face-selective and voice-selective brain regions. We used representational similarity analysis (RSA) to compare the representational geometries of face- and voice-elicited person-identities, and to investigate the degree to which pattern discriminants for pairs of identities generalise from one modality to the other. We found no matching geometries for faces and voices in any brain regions. However, we showed crossmodal generalisation of the pattern discriminants in the multimodal right posterior superior temporal sulcus (rpSTS), suggesting a modality-general person-identity representation in this region. Importantly, the rpSTS showed invariant representations of face- and voice-identities, in that discriminants were trained and tested on independent face videos (different viewpoint, lighting, background) and voice recordings (different vocalizations). Our findings support the Multimodal Processing Model, which proposes that face and voice information is integrated in multimodal brain regions.\n\nSignificance statementIt is possible to identify a familiar person either by looking at their face or by listening to their voice. Using fMRI and representational similarity analysis (RSA) we show that the right posterior superior sulcus (rpSTS), a multimodal brain region that responds to both faces and voices, contains representations that can distinguish between familiar people independently of whether we are looking at their face or listening to their voice. Crucially, these representations generalised across different particular face videos and voice recordings. Our findings suggest that identity information from visual and auditory processing systems is combined and integrated in the multimodal rpSTS region.
- Citations
- 48
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multimodal representations of person identity individuated with fMRI
Stefano Anzellotti, Alfonso Caramazza·CortexPeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2017
- Hierarchical brain network for face and voice integration of emotion expression
Jodie Davies-Thompson, Giulia V. Elli, … Olivier Collignon·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2018
- Representation of emotional expressions across the face and voice brain networks
Stefania Mattioni, Federica Falagiarda, … Olivier Collignon·bioRxiv·Dec 24, 2025
- Weighted RSA: an improved framework on the perception of audio-visual affective speech in left insula and superior temporal gyrus
Junhai Xu, Haibin Dong, … Jianwu Dang·NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2021
- Localized and Distributed Representations of Person Knowledge for Faces
Zarrar E. Shehzad, JohnMark Taylor, Gregory McCarthy·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2022
- Phonological representations of auditory and visual speech in the occipito-temporal cortex and beyond
Alice Van Audenhaege, Stefania Mattioni, … Olivier Collignon·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2025