Estimating sampling and laboratory capacity for a simulated African swine fever outbreak in the United States
Jason A. GalvisiD, Muhammed Y. Satici, Abagael L. SykesiD, Kathleen C. O’HaraiD, Lisa Rochette, David L. RobertsiD, Gustavo MachadoiD
Abstract
The introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into uninfected countries can impact economic and animal welfare. Rapid detection and control of the outbreak contribute to successful eradication and promote business continuity. We developed a model to determine the number of samples, sample collectors, laboratory capacity, and processing times following an ASFV introduction into the U.S. We simulated the spread of ASFV in one densely populated swine region, generating a median of 27 (range = 1-68) outbreaks in 150 days, resulting 616 (range = 1-15,011) sampling events with a total of 3,068 barns (range = 7-69,118) sampled. We calculated the total sample collectors needed, considering daily working hours, sampling and driving time, and laboratory capabilities with and without blood sample pooling. Samples included 31 blood samples and five oral fluid samples per barn, which equal 84,830 (range = 52-2,066,831) and 14,195 (range = 10-345,590) blood and oral fluid samples, respectively. The median number of sample collectors needed to prevent sampling delay varied from 136 to 367 and, in the worst epidemic scenarios, from 833 to 3,115. Notably, excluding downtime-which prevented the sampler from visiting additional farms for 24 or 72 hours-reduced the number of sample collectors needed between 28% and 75%, while switching from blood to oral fluid samples reduced this number between 47% and 75%. At a laboratory processing daily capacity of 1,000 samples, the median days for sample processing without pooling were 92 days, with a maximum of 5.7 years. We demonstrated a need to redistribute 10,062 (range = 2-67,940) unprocessed samples daily to other laboratories to prevent processing delays. Our study addresses the challenge of efficiently organizing resources for managing a potential ASFV outbreak, providing information about the number of sample collectors and laboratory capacity needed for one densely populated swine region in the U.S.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Field percentile
- top 16%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of Aggregate Oral Fluid Sampling for Early Detection of African Swine Fever Virus Infection
Bonto Faburay, Kathleen C. O’Hara, … Suelee Robbe‐Austerman·VirusesPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2025
- Modeling the transmission dynamics of African swine fever virus within commercial swine barns: Quantifying the contribution of multiple transmission pathways
Aniruddha Deka, Jason A. Galvis, … Gustavo Machado·EpidemicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2025
- Estimating the effectiveness of control actions on African swine fever transmission in commercial swine populations in the United States
A. Sykes, J. A. Galvis, … G. Machado·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2022
- Development of a simple and highly sensitive method for the concentration and detection of African swine fever virus in oral fluids and its feasibility assessment on raised pigs in Northern Vietnam
N. Mai Thi, G. Tran Thi Huong, … W. Yamazaki·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2024
- Identifying control strategies to eliminate African swine fever from the United States swine industry in under 12 months
Abagael L. Sykes, Jason A. Galvis, … Gustavo Machado·Preventive Veterinary MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2025
- Inefficient transmission of African swine fever virus to sentinel pigs from environmental contamination under experimental conditions
A. S. Olesen, L. Lohse, … R. Portugal·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2023