Biological CyberneticsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A Quality Measure for Repeating Multiple-Unit Spike Patterns
Günther PalmiD, Monica PaolettiiD, Junji ItoiD, Alessandra StellaiD, Sonja GrüniD
Abstract
We propose a quality measure for spatio-temporal spike patterns (STPs) in multiple-neuron recordings. In such recordings, repeating STPs or pattern repetitions (PRs) are often found, with many of these generated by chance. To rule those out, statistical tests have been developed to discriminate the unlikely from the more likely PRs. This statistical problem is complicated by the fact that there are several obvious quality criteria for a PR, such as the size (the number of spikes) of the pattern and the number of its occurrences. Here, we propose a canonical way of combining several criteria (which we collect in the so-called signature of the pattern) into a single quality measure, based on the unlikeliness of the pattern. This measure is defined mathematically, and a formula for its computation is derived for stationary spike trains. It can be used to compare PRs. Since spike trains are not stationary in practice, we discuss, for two experimental data sets, how well the stationary formula correlates with the defined quality measure as determined from simulations. The results encourage the use of the stationary formula or also some simpler, related formulas as proxies for the quality, for the comparison of PRs and also for statistical tests that avoid the multiple testing problem incurred by using several quality criteria. Based on our results, we propose a few test statistics, i.e., random variables on the space of multi-unit spike trains with an appropriate null-hypothesis distribution, to evaluate STPs with less computational and sampling efforts.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 42%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spike Count Analysis for MultiPlexing Inference (SCAMPI)
Yunran Chen, Jennifer M. Groh, Surya T. Tokdar·Journal of Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2026
- Synchrony, oscillations, and phase relationships in collective neuronal activity: a highly comparative overview of methods
Fabiano Baroni, Ben Fulcher·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2025
- A doubly stochastic renewal framework for partitioning spiking variability
Cina Aghamohammadi, Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Tatiana A. Engel·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2025
- Comparing surrogates to evaluate precisely timed higher-order spike correlations
Alessandra Stella, Peter Bouss, … Sonja Grün·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2022
- Axonal spike-count regimes link spinal cord stimulation periodicity to artificial sensory detection and discrimination in rodents
Taylor J Tvrdy, Aditi Bhattacharya, … Amol P. Yadav·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2026
- SpikeShip: A method for fast, unsupervised discovery of high-dimensional neural spiking patterns
Boris Sotomayor-Gómez, Francesco Paolo Battaglia, Martin A. Vinck·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2023