henhaobio
Sign in

Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Methods For Estimation Of Model Accuracy In CASP12

Arne ElofssoniD, Keehyoung JooiD, Chen KeasariD, Jooyoung LeeiD, Ali H. A. Maghrabi, Balachandran ManavalaniD, Liam James McGuffiniD, David Menéndez HurtadoiD, Claudio MirabelloiD, Robert Pilstål, Tomer SidiiD, Karolis UzielaiD, Björn WallneriD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Methods for reliably estimating the quality of 3D models of proteins are essential drivers for the wide adoption and serious acceptance of protein structure predictions by life scientists. In this paper, the most successful groups in CASP12 describe their latest methods for Estimates of Model Accuracy (EMA). We show that pure single model accuracy estimation methods has shown clear progress since CASP11; the three top methods (MESHI, ProQ3, SVMQA) all perform better than the top method of CASP11 (ProQ2). The pure single model accuracy estimation methods outperform quasi-single (ModFOLD6 variations) and consensus methods (Pcons, ModFOLDclust2, Pcomb-domain and Wallner) in model selection, but are still not as good as those methods in absolute model quality estimation and predictions of local quality. Finally, we show that when using contact based model quality measures (CAD, 1DDT) the single model quality methods perform relatively better.

Citations
34
FWCI
2.57
Field percentile
top 9%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISUziela '18Cheng '23Xie '26Chen '21Jing '20Chen '22
75% semantic matchBioinformatics
Karolis Uziela, David Menéndez Hurtado, Nanjiang Shu+2 more·Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics·Mar 9, 2018· 13 citations