Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech
Abstract
Acoustic information in speech changes continuously, yet listeners form discrete perceptual categories to ease the demands of perception. Being a more continuous/gradient as opposed to a discrete/categorical listener may be further advantageous for understanding speech in noise by increasing perceptual flexibility and resolving ambiguity. The degree to which a listeners responses to a continuum of speech sounds are categorical versus continuous can be quantified using visual analog scaling (VAS) during speech labeling tasks. Here, we recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to vowels along an acoustic-phonetic continuum (/u/ to /a/) while listeners categorized phonemes in both clean and noise conditions. Behavior was assessed using standard two alternative forced choice (2AFC) and VAS paradigms to evaluate categorization under task structures that promote discrete (2AFC) vs. continuous (VAS) hearing, respectively. Behaviorally, identification curves were steeper under 2AFC vs. VAS categorization but were relatively immune to noise, suggesting robust access to abstract, phonetic categories even under signal degradation. Behavioral slopes were positively correlated with listeners QuickSIN scores, suggesting a behavioral advantage for speech in noise comprehension conferred by gradient listening strategy. At the neural level, electrode level data revealed P2 peak amplitudes of the ERPs were modulated by task and noise; responses were larger under VAS vs. 2AFC categorization and showed larger noise-related delay in latency in the VAS vs. 2AFC condition. More gradient responders also had smaller shifts in ERP latency with noise, suggesting their neural encoding of speech was more resilient to noise degradation. Interestingly, source-resolved ERPs showed that more gradient listening was also correlated with stronger neural responses in left superior temporal gyrus. Our results demonstrate that listening strategy (i.e., being a discrete vs. continuous listener) modulates the categorical organization of speech and behavioral success, with continuous/gradient listening being more advantageous to speech in noise perception.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The categorical neural organization of speech aids its perception in noise
Gavin M. Bidelman, Lauren C. Bush, Alex M. Boudreaux·bioRxiv·May 30, 2019
- Auditory experience shapes how listeners exploit perceptual equivalency classes in speech and cope with noise degradation: Evidence from ''elliptical speech''
Gavin M. Bidelman, Zara Eisenhut, … David B. Pisoni·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- Consistency in phonetic categorization predicts successful speech-in-noise perception
Rose Rizzi, Gavin M. Bidelman·JASA Express LettersPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Perceptual consistency in phoneme categorization is driven by neural consistency and predicts improved speech-in-noise performance
Rose Rizzi, Jack R. Stirn, … Gavin M. Bidelman·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party"
Gavin M. Bidelman, Fallon Bernard, Kimberly Skubic·bioRxiv·Apr 3, 2024
- Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses
Jared A. Carter, Gavin M. Bidelman·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2023