bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Trial-by-trial fluctuations in post-stimulus attention during memory encoding predict subsequent associative context memory performance.
Abstract
Episodic memory formation rate varies over time partly due to fluctuations in attentional state during memory encoding. Emerging evidence suggests that fluctuations in pre- and/or post-stimulus attention during encoding impact subsequent memory performance. It remains unclear how these fluctuations may differentially impact the subsequent retrieval of items alone, compared to items + their contextual details (associative context memory). In this study, we explored this in 30 healthy younger adults (21-34 years old). We developed the Montreal Attention at Encoding (MAET) task where on each encoding trial, participants responded as quickly as possible to a central fixation cross that expanded in size after a random duration. They then had to encode a picture of an object and its spatial location. Memory for the object-location associations was tested during retrieval. Response time (RT) to the fixation cross presented prior to each object gauged pre-stimulus attention levels on a trial-by-trial basis, while RT to the fixation cross that ensued each object indexed post-stimulus attention levels. Within-subject logistic regressions were used to predict context and item memory performance from pre- and post-stimulus RTs. Results revealed that encoding pre-stimulus attentional levels did not differentially predict context vs. item memory. However, post-stimulus RTs did predict subsequent context retrieval such that, longer post-stimulus RT to the fixation was related to poorer subsequent context retrieval. This study introduces a novel paradigm for investigating the impact of attentional state at encoding on subsequent memory performance and indicate a link between post-stimulus delays in attention-related RT and associative encoding success.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The phase of Theta oscillations modulates successful memory formation at encoding
Josephine Cruzat, Mireia Torralba Cuello, … Salvador Soto‐Faraco·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2021
- Sustained attention and spatial attention distinctly influence long-term memory encoding
Megan T. deBettencourt, Stephanie D. Williams, … Edward Awh·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2021
- Encoding Variability: When Pattern Reactivation Does Not Benefit Context Memory
C. Sievers, F. W. Smith, … L. Renoult·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2019
- Evidence for a reactionary account of retrieval state initiation
Subin Han, Nicole M. Long·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Temporal anticipation based on memory
André M. Cravo, Gustavo Rohenkohl, … Anna Christina Nobre·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2017
- Environmental rhythms orchestrate neural activity at multiple stages of processing during memory encoding: Evidence from event-related potentials
Paige Connors Hickey, Annie Barnett-Young, … Elizabeth Race·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2020