bioRxivBiophysics
Free Energy Differences from Molecular Simulations: Exact Confidence Intervals from Transition Counts
Abstract
Here we demonstrate a method to estimate the errors of free energy differences calculated by molecular simulations. The widths of the confidence intervals can be calculated solely from temperature and the number of transitions between states. Accuracy better than {+/-} 4.184 kJ/mol (1 kcal/mol) can be achieved by a simulation at 300 K with four forward and four reverse transitions. Markovianity of the process is a pre-requisite. For a two-state Markovian system, the confidence interval suggested below is exact (not only asymptotic or approximative), regardless the number of transitions. TOC Graphic O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Energy Conservation as a Measure of Simulation Accuracy
Peter Eastman, Vijay S. Pande·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2016
- A variational method for efficient estimation of diffusion and free-energy profiles along collective variables
Anže Hubman, Franci Merzel·The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2026
- Data-guided Multi-Map variables for ensemble refinement of molecular movies
J. W. Vant, D. Sarkar, … A. Singharoy·The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2020
- The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: Assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations
A. Rizzi, T. Jensen, … J. D. Chodera·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2020
- Quantifying configuration-sampling error in Langevin simulations of complex molecular systems
J. Fass, D. Sivak, … J. Chodera·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2018
- On the accuracy of molecular simulation-based predictions of koff values: a Metadynamics study
R. Capelli, W. Lyu, … P. Carloni·The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2020