International Journal of GenomicsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Detecting Differential Variable microRNAs via Model-Based Clustering
Xuan LiiD, Yuejiao FuiD, Xiaogang WangiD, Dawn Lisa DeMeoiD, Kelan G. TantisiraiD, Scott T. WeissiD, Weiliang QiuiD
Abstract
Identifying genomic probes (e.g., DNA methylation marks) is becoming a new approach to detect novel genomic risk factors for complex human diseases. The F test is the standard equal-variance test in Statistics. For high-throughput genomic data, the probe-wise F test has been successfully used to detect biologically relevant DNA methylation marks that have different variances between two groups of subjects (e.g., cases vs. controls). In addition to DNA methylation, microRNA is another mechanism of epigenetics. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have identified differentially variable (DV) microRNAs. In this article, we proposed a novel model-based clustering to improve the power of the probe-wise F test to detect DV microRNAs. We imposed special structures on covariance matrices for each cluster of microRNAs based on the prior information about the relationship between variance in cases and variance in controls and about the independence among cases and controls. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed method is the first clustering algorithm that aims to detect DV genomic probes. Simulation studies showed that the proposed method outperformed the probe-wise F test and had certain robustness to the violation of the normality assumption. Based on two real datasets about human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we identified 7 DV-only microRNAs (hsa-miR-1826, hsa-miR-191, hsa-miR-194-star, hsa-miR-222, hsa-miR-502-3p, hsa-miR-93, and hsa-miR-99b) using the proposed method, one (hsa-miR-1826) of which has not yet been reported to relate to HCC in the literature.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.09
- Field percentile
- 43th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DiffVar: A new method for detecting differential variability with application to methylation in cancer and aging
Belinda Phipson, Alicia Oshlack·Genome BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2014
- New Statistical Methods for Constructing Robust Differential Correlation Networks
Danyang Yu, Zeyu Zhang, … Weiliang Qiu·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2019
- MINI REVIEW: Statistical methods for detecting differentially methylated loci and regions
Mark D Robinson, Abdullah Kahraman, … Xiaobei Zhou·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2014
- glmmDMR reveals replicate-level methylation variance as a major determinant of false-positive DMR detection
Yuki Daito, Mako Uechi, … Kaoru Tonosaki·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- coMethDMR: Accurate identification of co-methylated and differentially methylated regions in epigenome-wide association studies
Lissette Gomez, Gabriel Odom, … Lily Wang·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2019
- MethCP: Differentially Methylated Region Detection with Change Point Models
Boying Gong, Elizabeth A. Purdom·Journal of Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2020