bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Deficient stereopsis in the normal population revisited: why current clinical stereo tests may not be adequate
Robert F. HessiD, Rebecca Dillon, Rifeng Ding, Jiawei ZhouiD
Abstract
Significance statementApplied applications for occupational screening, clinical tests should assess sensitivity to the sign as well as the magnitude of disparity.\n\nPurposeTo determine why the high incidence of stereo anomaly found using laboratory tests with polarity-based increment judgements (i.e., depth sign) is not reflected in clinical measurements that involve single-polarity incremental judgements (i.e., depth magnitude).\n\nMethodsAn iPod-based measurement that involved the detection of an oriented shape defined by a single polarity-depth increment within a random dot display was used. A staircase procedure was used to gather sufficient trials to derive a meaningful measure of variance for the measurement of stereopsis over a large disparity range. Forty-five adults with normal binocular vision (20 - 65 years old) and normal or corrected-to-normal (0 logMAR or better) monocular vision participated in this study.\n\nResultsObservers stereo acuities ranged between 10 and 100 arc seconds, and were normally distributed on a log scale (p = 0.90, 2-tailed Shapiro-Wilk test). The present results using a single polarity depth increment task (i.e., depth magnitude) show a similar distribution to those using a similar task using the Randot preschool stereo test on individuals between the ages of 19-35 using either the 4-book test (n = 33) or the 3-book test (n = 40), but very different results when the iPod test involved a polarity-based increment judgement (i.e., depth sign).\n\nConclusionsThe present clinical stereo tests are based on magnitude judgements and are unable to detect the high percentage of stereo anomalous individuals in the normal population revealed using depth sign judgements.
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Stereo-anomaly is found more frequently in tasks that require discrimination between depths
Alex S. Baldwin, Seung Hyun Min, … Robert F. Hess·iSciencePeer-reviewed·May 2, 2024
- Stimulus-dependent depth constancy during head tilt
Jan Skerswetat, Andrea Caoli, Peter John Bex·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2022
- A comparison of tests for quantifying sensory eye dominance
Manuela Bossi, Lisa Marie Hamm, … Steven C. Dakin·Vision ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2018
- Identifying cortical substrates underlying the phenomenology of stereopsis and realness: A pilot fMRI study
Makoto Uji, Angelika Lingnau, … Dhanraj Vishwanath·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2019
- Stereo Slant Discrimination of Planar 3D Surfaces: Standard vs. Planar Cross-Correlation
C. Oluk, K. Bonnen, … W. S. Geisler·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2021
- A stimulus artefact undermines the evidence for independent ON and OFF channels in stereopsis
Jenny C. A. Read, Bruce G. Cumming·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2018