bioRxivBioengineering
Effects of additional load at different heights on gait initiation: a statistical parametric mapping of center of pressure and center of mass behavior
M. F. Vieira, F. B. Rodrigues, A. de Oliveira Assis, E. de Mendonca Mesquita, T. S. Lemes, G. A. G. De Villa, R. R. Baptista, A. de Oliveira Andrade, P. H. Lobo da Costa
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different vertical positions of an asymmetrical load on the anticipatory postural adjustments phase of gait initiation. Sixty-eight college students (32 males, 36 females; age: 23.65 {+/-} 3.21 years old; weight: 69.98 {+/-} 8.15 kg; height: 1.74 {+/-} 0.08 m) were enrolled in the study. Ground reaction forces and moments were collected using two force platforms. The participants completed three trials under each of the following random conditions: no-load (NL), waist uniformly distributed load (WUD), shoulder uniformly distributed load (SUD), waist stance foot load (WST), shoulder stance foot load (SST), waist swing foot load (WSW), and shoulder swing foot load (SSW). The paired Hotellings T-square test was used to compare the experimental conditions. The center of pressure (COP) time series were significantly different for the SUD vs. NL, SST vs. NL, WST vs. NL, and WSW vs. NL comparisons. Significant differences in COP time series were observed for all comparisons between waist vs. shoulder conditions. Overall, these differences were greater when the load was positioned at the shoulders. For the center of mass (COM) time series, significant differences were found for the WUD vs. NL and WSW vs. NL conditions. However, no differences were observed with the load positioned at the shoulders. In conclusion, only asymmetrical loading at the waist produced significant differences, and the higher the extra load, the greater the effects on COP behavior. By contrast, only minor changes were observed in COM behavior, suggesting that the changes in COP (the controller) behavior are adjustments to maintain the COM (controlled object) unaltered.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effect of anteroposterior perturbations on the control of the center of mass during treadmill walking
M. van den Bogaart, J. van Dieen, … P. Meyns·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2019
- Postural control in girls practicing volleyball is different than in non-playing peers: comparison of data on the center of pressure and ground reaction forces
D. Borzucka, K. Krecisz, M. Kuczynski·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2023
- Effects of age and surface instability on the control of the center of mass
M. van den Bogaart, S. M. Bruijn, … P. Meyns·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2021
- Weight-bearing symmetry changes after asymmetric surface stiffness walking
Mark Price, Elena G. Schell, … Wouter Hoogkamer·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2026
- Ankle muscles drive mediolateral center of pressure control to ensure stable steady state gait
A. M. van Leeuwen, Jaap H. van Dieën, … Sjoerd M. Bruijn·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2021
- The onset time of balance control during walking is phase-independent, but the magnitude of the response is not
Hendrik Reimann, Tyler Fettrow, … John J. Jeka·bioRxiv·May 31, 2019