bioRxivPlant BiologyPreprint
Comparative nectar metabolomics reveals sucrose-nitrogen tradeoffs and chemical drivers of microbial growth in floral nectar
Rachel Lee VannetteiD, Caitlin C. ReringiD, Jacob M. CecalaiD, Leta LanducciiD, Alexia M Lanier
Abstract
IntroductionMany plant species secrete nectar to attract beneficial animals. The chemical composition of floral nectar influences pollinator nutrition and behavior, as well as microbial growth in flowers. Yet factors that predict nectar composition across plant species, as well as chemical compounds determining microbial growth in nectar, remain poorly understood. MethodsWe used both targeted and untargeted metabolomics to compare the nectar chemical profiles across 31 phylogenetically diverse plant species that span a range of floral morphologies. We examined the common classes of compounds detected in nectar and patterns of co-occurrence among them. We combined newly collected chemical data with previously published data on microbial growth in nectar of the same plant species to examine how nectar chemistry is associated with microbial growth. ResultsPlant species and clades varied in amino acid, minor sugar, and secondary metabolite composition and concentration. Sampled rosids and lilioids generally contained higher amino acids while asterids contained greater concentrations of oligosaccharides and sugar alcohols. Across plant species, proteinogenic amino acids frequently co-occurred in nectar but many were negatively associated with sucrose concentration. Plant species with greater concentrations of amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds hosted greater microbial density in nectar, while some other compound groups were negatively associated with microbial diversity. ConclusionsNegative correlations between nectar amino acid and sucrose concentration across species suggest ecological tradeoffs or physiological constraints in nectar composition. Given that the growth of common nectar microbes is limited by amino acid concentration, these findings suggest an ecological cost to amino acid production in nectar. Finally, we document variation among species in nectar vitamins, non proteinogenic amino acids and secondary metabolites with hypothesized yet currently untested ecological roles.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Nectar compounds impact bacterial and fungal growth and shift community dynamics in a nectar analog
T. G. Mueller, J. S. Francis, R. L. Vannette·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2022
- Nectar chemistry reflects pollination strategies in alpine plant communities
Roberto Rebollo, Yan Yang, … Pengjuan Zu·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026
- Floral traits predict nectar rewards across diverse plant communities
Eva Herreros-Moya, Marianne E Sinka, … Kathy Willis·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026
- Metabolic and transcriptomic analyses of nectaries reveal differences in the mechanism of nectar production between monocots (Ananas comosus) and dicots (Nicotiana tabacum)
Thomas Göttlinger, Marcello Pirritano, … Gertrud Lohaus·BMC Plant BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2024
- Do pollinators play a role in shaping the essential amino acids found in nectar?
Rachel H. Parkinson, Eileen F. Power, … Geraldine A. Wright·New PhytologistPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025
- A quantitative survey of the blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) nectar microbiome: variation between cultivars, locations, and farm management approaches
C. Rering, A. Rudolph, … C. Hunter·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2023