bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Modeling the Hemodynamic Response Function for Prediction Errors in the Ventral Striatum
Abstract
To make sensible inferences about neural activation from fMRI data it is important to accurately model the hemodynamic response function (HRF), i.e., the hemodynamic response evoked by a punctuate neural event. HRF models have been derived for sensory areas, where it is relatively clear what events cause a neural impulse response. However, this is obviously harder to do for higher order cortices such as prefrontal areas. Therefore, one HRF model is commonly used for analyzing activity throughout the brain, despite the fact that hemodynamics are known to vary across regions. For instance, several fMRI studies use a canonical HRF to analyze ventral striatum (VS) activity where converging evidence indicates that reward prediction error signals drive neural activity. However, the VS is a target of prominent dopaminergic projections, known to modulate vasculature and affect BOLD activity, suggesting that the HRF in the VS may be especially different from those in other brain areas. To address this, we use data from an experiment focused on learning from prediction-error signals to derive a VS-specific HRF model (VS-HRF). We show that this new VS-HRF increases statistical power in model comparison. Our result is of particular relevance to studies comparing computational models of learning and/or decision making in the VS, and for connectivity analyses, where the use of an (even slightly) inaccurate HRF model can lead to erroneous conclusions. More broadly, our study highlights the importance of the choice of HRF model in determining the significance of the results obtained in classical univariate fMRI analysis.
- assay: imaging
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Hemodynamic modelling improves population receptive field estimates
Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf, Ecem Altan, … Catherine Morgan·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2025
- Modeling the hemodynamic response function using EEG-fMRI data during eyes-open resting-state conditions and motor task execution
Prokopis C. Prokopiou, Alba Xifra‐Porxas, … Georgios D. Mitsis·Brain TopographyPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2022
- BOLD response is more than just magnitude: improving detection sensitivity through capturing hemodynamic profiles
Gang Chen, Paul A. Taylor, … Simone P. Haller·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2023
- Comparison of hemodynamic response functions obtained from resting-state functional MRI and invasive electrophysiological recordings in rats
D. Rangaprakash, Olivier David A, … Gopikrishna Deshpande·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2023
- Development and validation of an fMRI-informed EEG model of reward-related ventral striatum activation
Neomi Singer, Gilad Poker, … Talma Hendler·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 22, 2023
- In model-based fMRI significant is less than specific
Erik J Peterson, Carol Augart Seger·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2018