bioRxivPaleontology
The Long Limb Bones of the StW 573 Australopithecus Skeleton from Sterkfontein Member 2: Descriptions and Proportions
J. L. Heaton, T. R. Pickering, K. J. Carlson, R. H. Crompton, T. Jashashvili, A. Beaudet, L. Bruxelles, K. Kuman, A. J. Heile, D. Stratford, R. J. Clarke
Abstract
Due to its completeness, the A.L. 288-1 (“Lucy”) skeleton has long served as the archetypal bipedal Australopithecus. However, there remains considerable debate about its limb proportions. There are three competing, but not necessarily mutually exclusive, explanations for the high humerofemoral index of A.L. 288-1: (1) a retention of proportions from an Ardipithecus-like most recent common ancestor (MRCA); (2) indication of some degree of climbing ability; (3) allometry. Recent discoveries of other partial skeletons of Australopithecus, such as those of A. sediba (MH1 and MH2) and A. afarensis (KSD-VP-1/1 and DIK-1/1), have provided new opportunities to test hypotheses of early hominin body size and limb proportions. Yet, no early hominin is as complete (>90%), as is the ~3.67 Ma “Little Foot” (StW 573) specimen, from Sterkfontein Member 2. Here, we provide the first descriptions of that skeleton’s upper and lower long limb bones, as well as a comparative context of its limb proportions. As to the latter, we found that StW 573 possesses absolutely longer limb lengths than A.L. 288-1, but both skeletons show similar limb proportions. This finding seems to argue against a purely allometric explanation for A.L. 288-1’s limb proportions. In fact, our multivariate allometric analysis suggests that limb lengths of Australopithecus, as represented by StW 573 and A.L. 288-1, developed along a significantly different (p < 0.001) allometric scale than that which typifies modern humans and African apes. Our analyses also suggest, as have those of others, that hominin limb evolution occurred in two stages with: (1) a modest increase in lower limb length and a concurrent shortening of the antebrachium between Ardipithecus and Australopithecus, followed by (2) considerable lengthening of the lower limb along with a decrease of both upper limb elements occurring between Australopithecus and Homo sapiens.View Full Text
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Functional Anatomy, Biomechanical Performance Capabilities and Potential Niche of StW 573: an Australopithecus Skeleton (circa 3.67 Ma) From Sterkfontein Member 2, and its significance for The Last Common Ancestor of the African Apes and for Hominin Origins
Robin Huw Crompton, Juliet McClymont, … Ronald Clarke·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2018
- A multiscale stratigraphic investigation of the context of StW 573 Little Foot and Member 2, Sterkfontein Caves, South Africa
L. Bruxelles, D. J. Stratford, … R. J. Clarke·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2018
- Bilateral Asymmetry of the Forearm Bones as Possible Evidence of Antemortem Trauma in the StW 573 Australopithecus Skeleton from Sterkfontein Member 2 (South Africa)
A.J. Heile, Travis Rayne Pickering, … R.J. Clarke·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2018
- The skull of StW 573, a 3.67 Ma Australopithecus skeleton from Sterkfontein Caves, South Africa
Ronald J Clarke, Kathleen Kuman·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2018
- New fossils of Australopithecus sediba reveal a nearly complete lower back
S. A. Williams, T. C. Prang, … L. R. Berger·bioRxiv·May 27, 2021
- 3D volumetric muscle reconstruction of the Australopithecus afarensis pelvis and limb, with estimations of limb leverage
A. L. Wiseman·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2022