bioRxivNeuroscience
A practical guide for improving transparency and reproducibility in neuroimaging research
Abstract
Recent years have seen an increase in alarming signals regarding the lack of replicability in neuroscience, psychology, and other related fields. To avoid a widespread crisis in neuroimaging research and consequent loss of credibility in the public eye, we need to improve how we do science. This article aims to be a practical guide for researchers at any stage of their careers that will help them make their research more reproducible and transparent while minimizing the additional effort that this might require. The guide covers three major topics in open science (data, code, and publications) and offers practical advice as well as highlighting advantages of adopting more open research practices that go beyond improved transparency and reproducibility.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing in Neuroimaging using MRI
Thomas E. Nichols, Samir Das, … B. T. Thomas Yeo·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2017
- Scanning the Horizon: Towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research
R. Poldrack, C. I. Baker, … T. Yarkoni·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2016
- Survey on Open Science Practices in Functional Neuroimaging
C. Paret, N. Unverhau, … M. Sicorello·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2021
- Highlight Results, Don't Hide Them: Enhance interpretation, reduce biases and improve reproducibility
Paul A. Taylor, Richard C. Reynolds, … Gang Chen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2023
- Current Reporting Practices in Human Neuroscience Research
Arianna M. Gard, Deena Ahmad Shariq, … Luke Williamson Hyde·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2024
- Reproducible and Transparent Research Practices in Published Neurology Research
S. L. Rauh, T. Torgerson, … M. Vassar·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2019