bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
The language network responds robustly to sentences across diverse tasks
Ruimin GaoiD, Chun Chuen CheungiD, Matthew SiegelmaniD, Alvince Le Arnz PongosiD, Hope KeaniD, Alyx Tanner, Evelina G. FedorenkoiD, Anna Aleksandrovna IvanovaiD
Abstract
A network of left frontal and temporal brain areas supports language comprehension and production, implementing computations related to word retrieval and combinatorial linguistic processing. Here, we ask: to what extent are responses to language in this language network stable across task contexts, and how does this stability compare to task sensitivity in the domain-general multiple demand (MD) network? Participants (n=52) read sentences and nonword lists under six task conditions, including passive reading, reading with a memory probe after each stimulus, and reading and answering questions that require deep semantic engagement. The sentences>nonwords contrast isolated the same set of language-responsive voxels across all tasks; the locations of those voxels were participant-specific, highlighting the value of individual-specific functional localization. We therefore conclude that language localization is robust to task variation. We then examined the magnitudes and fine-grained activation patterns in these language-responsive voxels (the language network) and in the domain-general MD network, to test whether task demands modulate linguistic computations and/or recruit a distinct brain system. The language network responded robustly to sentences across all tasks, with somewhat higher responses to semantically engaging tasks. In contrast, the MD network responded to both sentences and nonwords in the presence of a task, which warrants caution when using language paradigms that include task demands, as such paradigms engage two independent networks. A multivariate analysis further revealed that stimulus information is more easily decodable in the language network, whereas task information is more decodable in the MD network. These results suggest that the language and MD networks perform complementary functions during task-driven language comprehension, with the language network primarily extracting information from linguistic input and the MD network determining the appropriate response to the task.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The domain-general multiple demand (MD) network does not support core aspects of language comprehension: a large-scale fMRI investigation
Evgeniia Diachek, Idan Blank, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2020
- Domain-general brain regions do not track linguistic input as closely as language-selective regions
Idan Blank, Evelina G. Fedorenko·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2017
- Stimulus-modality independent activation of the brain network for language
Sophie Arana, André F. Marquand, … Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2020
- Incremental language comprehension difficulty predicts activity in the language network but not the multiple demand network
Leila Wehbe, Idan Blank, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2021
- The extended language network: Language responsive brain areas whose contributions to language remain to be discovered
Agata Wolna, Aaron Wright, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2026
- Content-Sensitive Linguistic Representations in the Human Multiple-Demand Network
Miriam Havin, Meir Meshulam, … Ariel Goldstein·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2026