Frontiers in Systems NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A model of bidirectional interactions betweencomplementary learning systems for memoryconsolidation of sequential experiences
Abstract
The standard theory of memory consolidation posits a dual-store memory system: a fast-learning fast-decaying hippocampus that transfers memories to slow-learning long-term cortical storage. Hippocampal lesions interrupt this transfer, so recent memories are more likely to be lost than more remote memories. Existing models of memory consolidation that simulate this temporally graded retrograde amnesia operate only on static patterns or unitary variables as memories. However, the mechanisms underlying the consolidation of episodes, which are sequential in nature and comprise multiple events, are not well understood. There is currently no computational theory for how memory replays of sequential experiences emerge dynamically during offline periods and how they are coordinated between the hippocampus and cortex to facilitate the stabilization of episodic memories. Further, there is evidence for a bi-directional interaction between the two memory systems during offline periods (Ji & Wilson, 2007), whereby the reactivation of waking neural patterns originating in the cortex triggers time-compressed sequential replays in the hippocampus, which in turn drive the consolidation of the pertinent sequence in the cortex. We have developed a computational model of memory encoding, consolidation, and recall for storing temporal sequences that explores the dynamics of this bi-directional interaction and time-compressed replays in four simulation experiments, providing novel insights into whether hippocampal learning needs to be suppressed for stable memory consolidation and into how new and old memories compete for limited replay opportunities during offline periods. The salience of experienced events, based on factors such as recency and frequency of use, is shown to have considerable impact on memory consolidation because it biases the relative probability that a particular event will be cued in the cortex during offline periods. In the presence of hippocampal learning during sleep, our model predicts that the fast-forgetting hippocampus can continually refresh the memory traces of a given episodic sequence if there are no competing experiences to be replayed.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Field percentile
- top 34%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Replay of procedural experience is independent of the hippocampus
Emmett J. Thompson, Lars B. Rollik, … Marcus Stephenson‐Jones·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2024
- A model of autonomous interactions between hippocampus and neocortex driving sleep-dependent memory consolidation
Dhairyya Singh, Kenneth A. Norman, Anna C. Schapiro·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2022
- Reactivation of time cell sequences in the hippocampus
Hindiael Belchior, Rodrigo Pavão, … Adriano B. L. Tort·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2018
- A Generative Model of Memory Construction and Consolidation
Eleanor Spens, Neil Burgess·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2024
- Neocortical Feedback Biases Hippocampal Reactivation Toward Unconsolidated Memories in a Predictive-Coding Model of Systems Consolidation
Paul Saighi·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026
- A unifying account of replay as context-driven memory reactivation
Zhenglong Zhou, Michael J. Kahana, Anna C. Schapiro·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2026