bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence
Abstract
Fitness results from the optimal balance between survival, mating success and fecundity. The interactions between these three components of fitness vary importantly depending on the selective context, from positive covariation between them, to antagonistic pleiotropic relationships when fitness increases in one reduce fitness of others. Therefore, elucidating the routes through which selection shapes life history and phenotypic adaptations via these fitness components is of primary significance to understand ecological and evolutionary dynamics. However, while the fitness components mediated by natural (survival) and sexual (mating success) selection have extensively been debated from most possible perspectives, fecundity selection remains considerably less studied. Here, we review the theory, evidence and implications of fecundity selection as a driver of sex-specific adaptive evolution. Based on accumulating literature on the life-history, phenotypic and ecological aspects of fecundity, we (i) suggest that fecundity is restricted to refer to brood size per reproductive episode, while annual and lifetime fecundity should not be used interchangeably with fecundity as they represent different life history parameters; (ii) provide a generalized redefinition of fecundity selection that encompasses any traits that influence fecundity in any direction (from high to low) and in either sex; (iii) review the (macro)ecological basis of fecundity selection (e.g., ecological pressures that influence predictable spatial variation in fecundity); (iv) suggest that most ecological theories of fecundity selection should be tested in organisms other than birds; (v) argue that the longstanding fecundity selection hypothesis of female-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) has gained inconsistent support, that strong fecundity selection does not necessarily drive female-biased SSD, and that this form of SSD can be driven by other selective pressures; and (vi) discuss cases in which fecundity selection operates on males.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sexual selection and flight as predictors of sexual size and shape dimorphism in stick and leaf insects
Romain Boisseau, Sven Bradler, Douglas J. Emlen·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2025
- Sexual selection does not predict long-term population trends in birds
Miguel Gómez‐Llano, Christopher R. Cooney, … Edward H. Morrow·bioRxiv·May 18, 2026
- Natural selection reverses the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait, which increases female fitness.
K. Okada, M. Katsuki, … D. Hosken·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2020
- Variance in within-pair reproductive success influences the opportunity for sexual selection annually and over the lifetimes of males in a multi-brooded songbird
R. Germain, M. T. Hallworth, … M. S. Webster·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2020
- The evolution of parental effects when selection acts on fecundity versus viability
B. Kuijper, R. A. Johnstone·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2019
- Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in animals
T. Janicke, S. Fromonteil·bioRxiv·May 10, 2021