Journal of Neural EngineeringBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
Neural Decoding and Feature Selection Techniques for Closed-Loop Control of Defensive Behavior
Jinhan LiuiD, Rebecca YounkiD, Lauren M Drahos, Sumedh Sopan NagraleiD, Sangeeta YadaviD, Alik S. WidgeiD, Mahsa ShoaraniD
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Field percentile
- top 46%
Abstract
ObjectiveMany psychiatric disorders involve excessive avoidant or defensive behavior, such as avoidance in anxiety and trauma disorders or defensive rituals in obsessive-compulsive disorders. Developing algorithms to predict these behaviors from local field potentials (LFPs) could serve as foundational technology for closed-loop control of such disorders. A significant challenge is identifying the LFP features that encode these defensive behaviors. ApproachWe analyzed LFP signals from the infralimbic cortex and basolateral amygdala of rats undergoing tone-shock conditioning and extinction, standard for investigating defensive behaviors. We utilized a comprehensive set of neuro-markers across spectral, temporal, and connectivity domains, employing SHapley Additive exPlanations for feature importance evaluation within Light Gradient-Boosting Machine models. Our goal was to decode three commonly studied avoidance/defensive behaviors: freezing, bar-press suppression, and motion (accelerometry), examining the impact of different features on decoding performance. Main resultsBand power and band power ratio between channels emerged as optimal features across sessions. High-gamma (80-150 Hz) power, power ratios, and inter-regional correlations were more informative than other bands that are more classically linked to defensive behaviors. Focusing on highly informative features enhanced performance. Across 4 recording sessions with 16 subjects, we achieved an average coefficient of determination of 0.5357 and 0.3476, and Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.7579 and 0.6092 for accelerometry jerk and bar press rate, respectively. Utilizing only the most informative features revealed differential encoding between accelerometry and bar press rate, with the former primarily through local spectral power and the latter via inter-regional connectivity. Our methodology demonstrated remarkably low time complexity, requiring <110 ms for training and <1 ms for inference. SignificanceOur results demonstrate the feasibility of accurately decoding defensive behaviors with minimal latency, using LFP features from neural circuits strongly linked to these behaviors. This methodology holds promise for real-time decoding to identify physiological targets in closed-loop psychiatric neuromodulation.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Decoding instrumental lever pressing from prefrontal, accumbens, and hippocampal local field potentials: conservation across sex, task, and dopamine depletion
Abhijith Mankili, Alev Ecevitoglu, … Ian H. Stevenson·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2026
- Decoding Fear or Safety and Approach or Avoidance by Brain-Wide Network Dynamics
Danilo Benette Marques, Matheus Teixeira Rossignoli, … João Pereira Leite·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2022
- Quantifying defensive behavior and threat response through integrated headstage accelerometry
Rebecca Younk, Alik S. Widge·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Dissociation of attentional state and behavioral outcome using local field potentials
Surya Prakash, J. Patrick Mayo, Supratim Ray·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2024
- Hippocampal disinhibition reduces contextual and elemental fear conditioning while sparing the acquisition of latent inhibition
Stuart A. Williams, Miriam Gwilt, … Tobias Bast·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Deep learning based decoding of local field potential events
Achim Schilling, Richard Carl Gerum, … Patrick Krauß·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2022