bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Current genomic deep learning models display decreased performance in cell type specific accessible regions
Pooja KathailiD, Richard W. ShuaiiD, Ryan ChungiD, Chun YeiD, Gabriel B. LoebiD, Nilah M. IoannidisiD
Abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSA number of deep learning models have been developed to predict epigenetic features such as chromatin accessibility from DNA sequence. Model evaluations commonly report performance genome-wide; however, cis regulatory elements (CREs), which play critical roles in gene regulation, make up only a small fraction of the genome. Furthermore, cell type specific CREs contain a large proportion of complex disease heritability. ResultsWe evaluate genomic deep learning models in chromatin accessibility regions with varying degrees of cell type specificity. We assess two modeling directions in the field: general purpose models trained across thousands of outputs (cell types and epigenetic marks), and models tailored to specific tissues and tasks. We find that the accuracy of genomic deep learning models, including two state-of-the-art general purpose models - Enformer and Sei - varies across the genome and is reduced in cell type specific accessible regions. Using accessibility models trained on cell types from specific tissues, we find that increasing model capacity to learn cell type specific regulatory syntax - through single-task learning or high capacity multi-task models - can improve performance in cell type specific accessible regions. We also observe that improving reference sequence predictions does not consistently improve variant effect predictions, indicating that novel strategies are needed to improve performance on variants. ConclusionsOur results provide a new perspective on the performance of genomic deep learning models, showing that performance varies across the genome and is particularly reduced in cell type specific accessible regions. We also identify strategies to maximize performance in cell type specific accessible regions.
- assay: ChIP-seq
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating deep learning for predicting epigenomic profiles
Shushan Toneyan, Ziqi Tang, Peter K. Koo·Nature Machine IntelligencePeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2022
- Transfer learning identifies sequence determinants of regulatory element accessibility
Marco Salvatore, Marc Horlacher, … Robin Andersson·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Predicting cell type-specific epigenomic profiles accounting for distal genetic effects
Alan E Murphy, William Beardall, … Nathan Skene·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 16, 2024
- Refining sequence-to-expression modelling with chromatin accessibility
Orsolya Lapohos, Gregory J. Fonseca, Amin Emad·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- Discovering differential genome sequence activity with interpretable and efficient deep learning
Jennifer Hammelman, David Kenneth Gifford·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2021
- Incorporating Gene Expression in Genome-wide Prediction of Chromatin Accessibility via Deep Learning
Qiao Liu, Kui Hua, … Rui Jiang·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2022