bioRxivPlant Biology
A revised phylogenetic classification for Viola (Violaceae)
T. Marcussen, H. E. Ballard, J. Danihelka, A. R. Flores, M. V. Nicola, J. M. Watson
Abstract
The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40-50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here we provide an updated, comprehensive classification of the genus, based on data from phylogeny, morphology, chromosome counts, and ploidy, and based on modern principles of monophyly. The revision is presented as an annotated global checklist of accepted species of Viola, an updated multigene phylogenetic network and an ITS phylogeny with denser taxon sampling, a brief summary of the taxonomic changes from Beckers classification and their justification, a morphological binary key to the accepted subgenera, sections and subsections, and an account of each infrageneric subdivision with justifications for delimitation and rank including a description, a list of apomorphies, molecular phylogenies where possible or relevant, a distribution map, and a list of included species. We subdivide the 658 species accepted by us into 2 subgenera, 31 sections, and 20 subsections. We erect one new subgenus of Viola (subg. Neoandinium, a replacement name for the illegitimate subg. Andinium), six new sections (sect. Abyssinium, sect. Himalayum, sect. Melvio, sect. Nematocaulon, sect. Spathulidium, sect. Xanthidium), and seven new subsections (subsect. Australasiaticae, subsect. Bulbosae, subsect. Clausenianae, subsect. Cleistogamae, subsect. Dispares, subsect. Formosanae, subsect. Pseudorupestres). Evolution within the genus is discussed in light of biogeography, fossil record, morphology, and particular traits. Viola is among very few temperate and widespread genera that originated in South America. The biggest identified knowledge gaps for Viola concern the South American taxa, for which basic knowledge from phylogeny, chromosome counts, and fossil data is virtually absent. Viola has also never been subject to comprehensive anatomical study. Study on seed anatomy and morphology is required to understand the fossil record of the genus.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Six New Species and Two Reinstatements of Viola (Violaceae) from China
Yanshuang Huang, Qiang Fan·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2025
- A new phylogeny and phylogenetic classification for Solanaceae
Rocío Deanna, Gloria E. Barboza, … Richard G. Olmstead·TaxonPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2026
- Phylogenomics of the mega genus Bulbophyllum (Orchidaceae) with implications for infrageneric classification in the Asian clade
Consolata Nanjala, Lalita Simpson, … Katharina Nargar·Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2026
- Plastid phylogenomics of the Sansevieria clade (Dracaena; Asparagaceae) resolves a rapid evolutionary radiation
I. van Kleinwee, I. Larridon, … E. Veltjen·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2021
- Classification of Urticaceae based on morphology and phylogenetic inference
Alexandre K. Monro, Olivier Maurin, … Elliot M. Gardner·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025
- Towards a phylogenomic classification of Magnoliidae
A. J. Helmstetter, Z. Ezedin, … H. Sauquet·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2024