bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Delivering on Biden's 2030 conservation commitment
Abstract
On January 27, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, committing the United States to various goals within his campaigns major climate policy, the Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. Included in this executive order is a commitment to "conserving at least 30 percent of [the United States] lands and oceans by 2030." This ambitious conservation target signals a promising direction for biodiversity in the United States. However, while the executive order outlines several goals for climate mitigation, the 30x30 target remains vague in its objectives, actions, and implementation strategies for protecting biodiversity. Biodiversity urgently needs effective conservation action, but it remains unclear where and what this 30% target will be applied to. Achieving different climate and biodiversity objectives will require different strategies and, in combination with the associated costs of implementation, will lead to different priority areas for conservation actions. Here, we illustrate what the 30% target could look like across four objectives reflective of the ambitious goals outlined in the executive order. We compile several variations of terrestrial protected area networks guided by these different objectives and examine the trade-offs in costs, ecosystem representation, and climate mitigation potential between each. We find little congruence in priority areas across objectives, emphasizing just how crucial it will be for the Biden administration to develop clear objectives and establish appropriate performance metrics from the outset to maximize both conservation and climate outcomes in support of the 30x30 target. We discuss important considerations that must guide the administrations conservation strategies in order to ensure meaningful conservation outcomes can be achieved over the next decade.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identifying key federal, state, and private lands strategies for achieving 30x30 in the US
L. Dreiss, J. W. Malcom·Conservation LettersPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Where, who, and what counts under area-based conservation targets: A framework for identifying opportunities that benefit biodiversity, climate mitigation, and human communities
B. L. Bateman, M.-L. E. Feng, … C. Wilsey·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2023
- Limiting the loss of terrestrial ecosystems to safeguard nature for biodiversity and humanity
J. S. Simmonds, A. F. Suarez-Castro, … M. Maron·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2021
- 30x30 biodiversity gains rely on national coordination
I. Eckert, A. Brown, … L. J. Pollock·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2022
- The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity
J. R. Allan, H. P. Possingham, … J. E. M. Watson·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2021
- Targeting current species ranges and carbon stocks fails to conserve biodiversity in a changing climate: opportunities to support climate adaptation under 30x30
L. M. Dreiss, L. M. Lacey, … J. W. Malcom·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2021