bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
CurateMake: an auditable workflow for multi-source ITS reference database harmonisation and phylogenetic validation
Auguste GardetteiD, Eugeni BeldaiD, Edi PriftiiD, Jean‐Daniel ZuckeriD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
O_LIReference databases shape the taxonomic resolution, uncertainty, and reproducibility of metabarcoding analyses. For ITS barcodes, public references are distributed across repositories with different taxonomic conventions, geographic coverage, and annotation practices, creating conflicts, missing ranks, and misannotations when databases are merged or compared. C_LIO_LIWe introduce CurateMake, a reproducible Snakemake workflow for ITS reference database construction, harmonisation, and validation. It integrates four public sources (UNITE, BOLD, PLANiTS, and CALeDNA) and user-supplied databases, combines Catalogue of Life name harmonisation with ITSx-based region standardisation, MSA/HMM-based alignment grouping, and SATIVA phylogenetic validation. Raw, CoL-harmonised, and SATIVA-validated annotation layers are retained throughout to compare curation effects while preserving flagged records for review. C_LIO_LIWe evaluated CurateMake on 3.58 million ingested sequences and controlled error-injection simulations. ITSx expanded the final harmonised database to 5.19 million barcode-resolved entries by recovering ITS1 and ITS2 sub-regions from full-length ITS records. Across the full dataset, normalised intra-cluster entropy decreased from Raw to CoL-harmonised to SATIVA-validated annotations, consistent with improved taxonomic coherence. In simulations, CurateMake achieved the highest correction rate across 1%-50% corruption and, at 15% corruption, corrected 42% {+/-} 1% of introduced errors, compared with 28% {+/-} 1% for CoL alone and 0% for SATIVA without the workflows alignment infrastructure. C_LIO_LIThese results show that nomenclatural harmonisation and phylogeny-informed validation address complementary error classes, with phylogenetic validation contributing measurably only within taxon-coherent alignments in this benchmark. CurateMake therefore provides a reproducible, provenance-tracked framework for auditable ITS reference database curation in metabarcoding workflows. C_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Automating the Curation of DNA Barcode Databases for Vascular Plants
Andreas Kolter, Paul D. N. Hebert·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Semi-automated curation and manual addition of sequences to build reliable and extensive reference databases for ITS2 vascular plant DNA (meta-)barcoding
Andreia Quaresma, Carlos Yadró, … Alexander Keller·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2023
- COInr and mkCOInr: Building and customizing a non-redundant barcoding reference database from BOLD and NCBI using a lightweight pipeline.
Emese Meglécz·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2023
- Generating, curating, and evaluating trnL reference sequence databases: Benchmarking OBITools3/ecoPCR, RESCRIPt, and MetaCurator
Ozge S Kuddar, Kelly A. Meiklejohn, Benjamin J. Callahan·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2026
- A framework for the development of a global standardised marine taxon reference image database (SMarTaR-ID) to support image-based analyses
K. L. Howell, J. S. Davies, … D. Wagner·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2019
- rCRUX: A Rapid and Versatile Tool for Generating Metabarcoding Reference libraries in R
Emily Curd, Luna Gal, … Zachary J. Gold·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2023