CortexNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory
Abstract
Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture, contingent capture, and other paradigms suggests that mechanisms supporting human visual working memory (VWM) and visual attention are intertwined. Features held in VWM bias guidance toward matching items even when those features are task irrelevant. However, the neural basis of this interaction is underspecified. Prior examinations using fMRI have primarily relied on coarse comparisons across experimental conditions that produce varying amounts of capture. To examine the neural dynamics of attentional capture on a trial-by-trial basis, we applied an oculomotor paradigm that produced discrete measures of capture. On each trial, subjects were shown a memory item, followed by a blank retention interval, then a saccade target that appeared to the left or right. On some trials, an irrelevant distractor appeared above or below fixation. Once the saccade target was fixated, subjects completed a forced-choice memory test. Critically, either the target or distractor could match the feature held in VWM. Although task irrelevant, this manipulation produced differences in behavior: participants were more likely to saccade first to an irrelevant VWM-matching distractor compared with a non-matching distractor - providing a discrete measure of capture. We replicated this finding while recording eye movements and scanning participants brains using fMRI. To examine the neural basis of oculomotor capture, we separately modeled the retention interval for capture and non-capture trials within the distractor-match condition. We found that frontal activity, including anterior cingulate cortex and superior frontal gyrus regions, differentially predicted subsequent oculomotor capture by a memory-matching distractor. Other regions previously implicated as involved in attentional capture by VWM-matching items showed no differential activity across capture and no-capture trials, even at a liberal threshold. Our findings demonstrate the power of trial-by-trial analyses of oculomotor capture as a means to examine the underlying relationship between VWM and attentional guidance systems.
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Field percentile
- top 33%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Visual working memory-related saccade biases are amplified by task demands, without updating working memory content
Patrik Polgári, Alexander C. Schütz·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2025
- Flexible gaze reinstatement during working memory for natural scenes
Yueying Dong, Yun-chen Hung, … Anastasia Kiyonaga·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2025
- Distinct neural correlates for focusing on similar memory contents originating from current or previous experience
Dongyu Gong, Dejan Draschkow, Anna Christina Nobre·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2026
- Dissecting the neural focus of attention reveals distinct processes for spatial attention and object-based storage in visual working memory
Nicole Hakim, Kirsten C. S. Adam, … Edward K. Vogel·Psychological SciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2019
- Jointly looking to the past and the future in visual working memory
Baiwei Liu, Zampeta-Sofia Alexopoulou, Freek van Ede·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2023
- Neural signatures of competition between voluntary and involuntary influences over the focus of attention in visual working memory
Yun Ding, Bradley R. Postle, Freek van Ede·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024