bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Task-optimized neural networks reveal distinct contributions of specialized and broader visual learning to neural representations of face familiarity
Abstract
How neural activity across the ventral visual hierarchy supports face recognition is an open question. A long-standing debate asks whether face processing, particularly in fusiform cortex, relies on face-specific computations or representations shared with broader visual recognition. Here we combine source-resolved magnetoencephalography (MEG) with task-optimized neural networks as controlled computational models of visual experience. Rather than manipulating long-term expertise in human observers, we systematically vary learning objective on the model side-what the networks are trained to recognize-while holding architecture and loss function constant within model comparisons. We then ask which learned representational geometries best align with neural responses, where and when. We measured millisecond-resolved brain-model alignment across V1, lateral occipital cortex (LOC) and fusiform cortex while participants viewed familiar, unfamiliar and scrambled faces. The same stimuli were presented to seven CNN architectures trained for face-identity recognition (FR), object-category recognition (OR) or object categorization including a face category (Dual), alongside untrained controls. Familiarity produced a stage-dependent dissociation: in LOC, familiar faces showed earlier brain-model alignment than unfamiliar faces in the M170 range, an effect most consistent in models trained for face-recognition, whereas broader objectives produced more variable, architecture-dependent peak alignment latencies. In fusiform cortex they showed stronger alignment around the M200 range. This fusiform advantage was not uniquely associated with face-recognition training: dual- and object-trained models showed greater fusiform correspondence than face-trained models. Together, these findings support stage-dependent specialization, with training for face-identity recognition constraining intermediate-stage timing while later fusiform representations remain compatible with representational structure acquired through broader visual computations.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Face recognition depends on specialized mechanisms tuned to view-invariant facial features: Insights from deep neural networks optimized for face or object recognition
Naphtali Abudarham, Idan Daniel Grosbard, Galit Yovel·Cognitive SciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2021
- Explaining face representation in the primate brain using different computational models
Le Chang, Bernhard Egger, … Doris Ying Tsao·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 4, 2021
- A performance-optimized model of neural responses across the ventral visual stream
Darren Seibert, Daniel Yamins, … Justin L. Gardner·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2016
- Configural and featural processing, and their role in the face network
Yuxuan Zeng, Ren E Hentz, David E. Osher·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2026
- Neural representations of faces are tuned to eye movements
Lisa Stacchi, Meike Ramon, … Roberto Caldara·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2019
- Evidence for face selectivity in early vision
Florence Campana, Jacob G. Martin, … Maximilian Riesenhuber·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2020