bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Drivers of adaptive capacity in wild populations: implications for genetic interventions
Abstract
The unprecedented rate of environmental change in the Anthropocene poses evolutionary challenges for wild populations globally. Active human interventions are being increasingly considered to accelerate natural adaptive processes. Evolutionary models can evaluate how species may fare under future climate, elucidate which evolutionary processes are critical to rapid adaptation, and how active interventions may influence fitness trajectories of organisms. Here we use polygenic metapopulation adaptation models to quantify the relative importance (effect sizes) of different eco-evolutionary parameters on the rates of adaptation in wild populations i) without active interventions, and ii) under a subset of active interventions. We demonstrate that genetic diversity (heterozygosity, He), population connectivity and the effect size of additive genetic variance are the primary drivers of natural adaptation rates. We quantify the effect sizes of these parameters on population fitness across three proposed assisted evolution scenarios and identify critical thresholds for intervention effectiveness and implementation. Specifically, the interventions tested here were most effective at low levels of genetic diversity in target populations (He < 0.2) and when timed during a cold-to-warm phase of an ENSO-like oscillation. Beneficial levels of connectivity were highly dependent on desired outcomes for the meta-population. We also present a global meta-analysis of genetic diversity in tropical reef-building corals as a case study of how thresholds derived from evolutionary models can be used to guide decision making by managers. We find genetic diversity to be highly variable by coral taxon and region, highlighting how thresholds from evolutionary models can be used in conjunction with empirical data to assess intervention needs and priorities. Finally, we highlight the critical knowledge and data gaps to produce the next suite of applied models for conservation management decision-support.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How density dependence, genetic erosion, and the extinction vortex impact evolutionary rescue
S. W. Nordstrom, R. A. Hufbauer, … B. A. Melbourne·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2022
- Habitat remediation followed by managed connectivity reduces unwanted changes in evolutionary trajectory of high extirpation risk populations
G. F. Lamka, J. R. Willoughby·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2023
- Nucleotide diversity is a poor predictor of short-term adaptive potential
Katie Abson, Lillith C. Zijmers, … Jarrod D. Hadfield·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2026
- Evolutionary rescue in one dimensional stepping stone models
Matteo Tomasini, Stephan Peischl·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2020
- Modeling Adaptive and Non-adaptive Responses of Populations to Environmental Change
T. Coulson, B. E. Kendall, … J.-M. Gaillard·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2017
- Polygenic and monogenic adaptation drive evolutionary rescue at different magnitudes of environmental change
Tatiana Bellagio, Moisés Expósito‐Alonso·Journal of HeredityPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2026