henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint

Mapping the brain basis of appraisals and discrete emotions

Qingying YeiD, Severi SantavirtaiD, Asli ErdemliiD, Jinglu CheniD, Vesa PutkineniD, David SanderiD, Lauri NummenmaaiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

The Component Process Model of Emotion conceptualizes any emotional episode (e.g., the discrete emotions of sadness, anger, fear, or interest) as being driven by the multiple appraisal components. However, both the specificity of the neural mechanisms underlying appraisal processes and the way these appraisal networks relate to the neural circuits underlying discrete emotions remain unclear. Here we investigated the neural correlates of appraisal processes and compared them with those of discrete emotions. Participants (n = 97) were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while watching short movie clips with varying emotional contents. Intensity for 12 appraisals and 12 basic and epistemic emotions evoked by the movie clips were rated by independent participants (n = 444). The neural responses were modelled with convolved ratings of appraisals and discrete emotions. The results indicated that appraisals and discrete emotions are supported by a shared set of distributed brain regions that extend beyond typically reported emotion-related areas, encompassing perceptual, action-related, and higher-order cognitive systems. Activations were more consistent for and better explained by appraisals versus discrete emotions. Within this network, epistemic emotions elicited less consistent activations than basic emotions, particularly in limbic regions. Our results highlight the functional organization of appraisals and discrete emotions under dynamic and complex conditions and indicate that appraisal theories better explain neural responses than discrete emotion models.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMohammadi '20Saarimäki '25Grootswager '17Frömer '19Saarimäki '18Xu '26
77% semantic matchNeuroscience
Gelareh Mohammadi, Dimitri Van De Ville, Patrik O. Vuilleumier·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2020· 9 citations