bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Searching for Consistent Brain Network Topologies Across the Garden of (Shortest) Forking Paths
Andrea I. LuppiiD, Helena Marie GellerseniD, Alexander R. D. PeattieiD, Anne E. ManktelowiD, David Krishna MenoniD, Stavros I. DimitriadisiD, Emmanuel Andreas StamatakisiD
Abstract
The functional interactions between regions of the human brain can be viewed as a network, empowering neuroscientists to leverage tools such as graph theory to obtain insight about brain function. However, obtaining a brain network from functional neuroimaging data inevitably involves multiple steps of data manipulation, which can affect the organisation (topology) of the resulting network and its properties. Test-retest reliability is a gold standard for both basic research and clinical use: a suitable data-processing pipeline for brain networks should recover the same network topology across repeated scan sessions of the same individual. Analyzing resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) recordings from two test-retest studies across short (45 minutes), medium (2-4 weeks) and long term delays (5-16 months), we investigated the reliability of network topologies constructed by applying 576 unique pipelines to the same fMRI data, obtained from considering combinations of atlas type and size, edge definition and thresholding, and use of global signal regression. We adopted the portrait divergence, an information-theoretic criterion to measure differences in network topology across all scales, enabling us to quantify the influence of different pipelines on the overall organisation of the resulting network. Remarkably, our findings reveal that the choice of pipeline plays a fundamental role in determining how reproducible an individuals brain network topology will be across different scans: there is large and systematic variability across pipelines, such that an inappropriate choice of pipeline can distort the resulting network more than an interval of several months between scans. Across datasets and time-spans, we also identify specific combinations of data-processing steps that consistently yield networks with reproducible topology, enabling us to make recommendations about best practices to ensure high-quality brain networks.
- Citations
- 8
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Converging on consistent functional connectomics
Andrea I. Luppi, Helena Marie Gellersen, … Emmanuel Andreas Stamatakis·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2023
- Optimizing network neuroscience computation of individual differences in human spontaneous brain activity for test-retest reliability
Chao Jiang, Ye He, … Xi‐Nian Zuo·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Assessing The Repeatability of Multi-Frequency Multi-Layer Brain Network Topologies Across Alternative Researchers Choice Paths
Stavros I. Dimitriadis·NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2022
- Test-retest reliability of resting-state fMRI functional connectivity: impact of scan length and number of participants
Beatriz Vale, Marta Correia, Patricia Figueiredo·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2026
- Identifying Brain Network Topology Changes in Task Processes and Psychiatric Disorders
Paria Rezaeinia, Kim Fairley, … R. McKell Carter·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2019
- Short-term test-retest reliability of the human intrinsic functional connectome
Leonardo Tozzi, Scott L. Fleming, … Leanne Maree Williams·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 20, 2020