henhaobio
Sign in

GigaScienceGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

High-throughput phenotyping with deep learning gives insight into the genetic architecture of flowering time in wheat

Xu WangiD, Hong XuaniD, Byron EversiD, Sandesh Kumar ShresthaiD, Robert B. PlessiD, Jesse PolandiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundPrecise measurement of plant traits with precision and speed on large populations has emerged as a critical bottleneck in connecting genotype to phenotype in genetics and breeding. This bottleneck limits advancements in understanding plant genomes and the development of improved, high-yielding crop varieties. ResultsHere we demonstrate the application of deep learning on proximal imaging from a mobile field vehicle to directly score plant morphology and developmental stages in wheat under field conditions. We developed and trained a convolutional neural network with image datasets labeled from expert visual scores and used this breeder-trained network to directly score wheat morphology and developmental stages. For both morphological (awned) and phenological (flowering time) traits, we demonstrate high heritability and extremely high accuracy against the ground-truth values from visual scoring. Using the traits scored by the network, we tested genotype-to-phenotype association using the deep learning phenotypes and uncovered novel epistatic interactions for flowering time. Enabled by the time-series high-throughput phenotyping, we describe a new phenotype as the rate of flowering and show heritable genetic control. ConclusionsWe demonstrated a field-based high-throughput phenotyping approach using deep learning that can directly score morphological and developmental phenotypes in genetic populations. Most powerfully, the deep learning approach presented here gives a conceptual advancement in high-throughput plant phenotyping as it can potentially score any trait in any plant species through leveraging expert knowledge from breeders, geneticist, pathologists and physiologists.

Citations
92
FWCI
11.42
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.