henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint

Evaluating Quantitative and Functional MRI As Potential Techniques to Identify the Subdivisions in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

Irem YildirimiD, Khan HekmatyariD, Keith Allan SchneideriD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Segmenting the magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) divisions of the human lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) has been challenging yet remains an important goal because the LGN is the only place in the brain where these two information streams are spatially disjoint and can be studied independently. Previous research used the amplitude of responses to different types of stimuli to separate M and P regions (Denison et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015). However, this method is confounded because the hilum region of the LGN exhibits greater response amplitudes to all stimuli and can be mistaken for the M subdivision (DeSimone & Schneider, 2019). Therefore, we have employed two independent methodologies that do not rely upon the functional response properties of the M and P neurons to segment the M and P regions: 1) structural quantitative MRI (qMRI) at 3T to measure the T1 relaxation time, and 2) monocular and dichoptic functional MRI (fMRI) procedures to measure eye-specific responses. Our qMRI results agreed with the anatomical expectations, identifying M regions on the ventromedial surface of the LGN. The monocular fMRI procedure was better than the dichoptic condition to identify the eye-dominance signals. Both procedures revealed significant right eye bias, and neither could reliably identify the first M layer of the LGN. These findings indicated that the qMRI methods are promising whereas the functional identification of contralateral layers requires further refinement. HighlightsO_LIT1 parameter in qMRI segregates M and P regions of LGN in individual subjects at 3T. C_LIO_LIEye-specific voxels in LGN respond more strongly to monocular than dichoptic viewing. C_LIO_LIClusters of eye-specific regions but not layers can be separated at 1.5 mm resolution. C_LI

Citations
1

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMüller-Axt '21Oishi '22Sardaripour '22Mu '21Williams '24Wen '20
84% semantic matchNeuroscience
Christa Müller-Axt, Cornelius Eichner, Henriette Rusch+5 more·NeuroImage·Sep 22, 2021· 23 citations