bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in Europe and implications for population control
L. M. Smith, C. Goold, R. Quinnell, A. Munteanu, S. Hartmann, P. Dalla Villa, L. Collins
Abstract
Changes in free-roaming dog population size are important indicators of the effectiveness of dog population management. Assessing the effectiveness of different management methods also requires estimating the processes that change population size, such as the rates of recruitment into and removal from a population. This is one of the first studies to quantify the size, rates of recruitment and removal, and health and welfare status of free-roaming dog populations in Europe. We determined the size, dynamics, and health status of free-roaming dog populations in Pescara, Italy, and Lviv, Ukraine, over a 15-month study period. Both study populations had ongoing dog population management through catch-neuter-release and sheltering programmes. Average monthly apparent survival probability was 0.93 (95% CI 0.81-1.00) in Pescara and 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-0.99) in Lviv. An average of 7 dogs km-2 were observed in Pescara and 40 dogs km-2 in Lviv. Per capita entry probabilities varied between 0.09 and 0.20 in Pescara, and 0.12 and 0.42 in Lviv. In Lviv, detection probability was lower on weekdays (odds ratio: 0.74, 95% CI 0.53-0.96) and higher on market days (odds ratio: 2.58, 95% CI 1.28-4.14), and apparent survival probability was lower in males (odds ratio: 0.25, 95% CI 0.03-0.59). Few juveniles were observed in the study populations, indicating that recruitment may be occurring by movement between dog subpopulations (e.g. from local owned or neighbouring free-roaming dog populations), with important consequences for population control. This study provides important data for planning effective dog population management and for informing population and infectious disease modelling. The results emphasise the importance of dog population management efforts that encourage responsible ownership through reduced abandonment and cover the entire city to reduce the risk of dog movement between sections of the city hindering management efforts.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Public attitudes towards free-roaming dogs and dog ownership practices in Bulgaria, Italy, and Ukraine
L. M. Smith, R. Quinnell, … L. Collins·bioRxiv·May 17, 2021
- Assessing the impact of free-roaming dog population management through systems modelling
L. M. Smith, R. J. Quinnell, … L. M. Collins·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2021
- Highly Dynamic Population of Owned Dogs and Implications for Zoonosis Control
Elvis W. Díaz, Stephanie Sila, … Ricardo Castillo-Neyra·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2025
- Estimation of free-roaming dog populations using Google Street View: A Validation Study
Guillermo Porras, Elvis W. Díaz, … Ricardo Castillo-Neyra·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2025
- Modelling sterilisation strategies to maximise population impact and cost-efficiency in free-roaming dog populations
Helen R. Fielding, Paul Richard Bessell, … Stella Mazeri·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026
- Changes in free-roaming dog population demographics and health associated with a catch-neuter-vaccinate-release program in Jamshedpur, India
Lauren Smith, Tamara Kartal, … Lisa Collins·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2025