bioRxivEcology
Integrating carbon stocks and wildlife connectivity for nature-based climate solutions
P. O'Brien, J. S. Gunn, A. Clark, J. Gleeson, R. Pither, J. Bowman
Abstract
Actions to protect against biodiversity loss and climate change will require a framework that addresses synergies between these interrelated issues. In this study we present methods for identifying areas important for the implementation of nature-based climate solutions and biodiversity conservation by intersecting high resolution spatial data for carbon storage and terrestrial connectivity. We explored the spatial congruence of carbon and connectivity in Ontario, Canada and examined effectiveness of current protected areas coverage. We found a weak positive relationship between carbon stocks and terrestrial connectivity; however, our maps revealed large hotspots, with high values of both indices, throughout the boreal forest and northern peatlands and smaller, isolated hotspots in the settled landscapes of the south. Location of hotspots varied depending on whether we considered forest or soil carbon. Further, our results show that current protected and conserved areas in Ontario only cover 13% of landscapes with the highest values for both carbon storage and connectivity. Protection or restoration of areas that maximize the co-benefits of carbon storage and connectivity would make significant contributions towards ambitious national targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve biodiversity.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multi-city analysis of synergies and trade-offs between urban bird diversity and carbon storage to inform decision-making
Riikka P. Kinnunen, Carly D. Ziter, Barbara Frei·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2024
- Areas of global importance for terrestrial biodiversity, carbon, and water
- Only ten percent of the global terrestrial protected area network is connected via intact land
M. S. Ward, S. Saura, … J. E. M. Watson·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2020
- Functional Connectivity of the World's Protected Areas
A. Brennan, R. Naidoo, … C. Kremen·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2021
- Would conserving natural land cover in landscapes conserve biodiversity?
Rafael X. De Camargo, David J. Currie·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2018
- Targeting current species ranges and carbon stocks fails to conserve biodiversity in a changing climate: opportunities to support climate adaptation under 30x30
L. M. Dreiss, L. M. Lacey, … J. W. Malcom·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2021