bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Sensitivity to sequential regularities in risky decision making
Andrea KóboriD, Ádám TakácsiD, Karolina JanacsekiD, Zsófia KardosiD, Valéria CsépeiD, Dezső NémethiD
Abstract
Probabilistic sequence learning involves a set of robust mechanisms that enable the extraction of statistical patterns embedded in the environment. It contributes to different perceptual and cognitive processes as well as to effective behavior adaptation, which is a crucial aspect of decision making. Although previous research attempted to model reinforcement learning and reward sensitivity in different risky decision-making paradigms, the basic mechanism of the sensitivity to statistical regularities has not been anchored to external tasks. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the statistical learning mechanism underlying individual differences in risky decision making. To reach this goal, we tested whether implicit probabilistic sequence learning and risky decision making share common variance. To have a more complex characterization of individual differences in risky decision making, hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on performance data obtained in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in a large sample of healthy young adults. Implicit probabilistic sequence learning was measured by the Alternating Serial Reaction Time (ASRT) task. According to the results, a four-cluster structure was identified involving average risk-taking, slowly responding, risk-taker, and risk-averse groups of participants, respectively. While the entire sample showed significant learning on the ASRT task, we found greater sensitivity to statistical regularities in the risk-taker and risk-averse groups than in participants with average risk-taking. These findings revealed common mechanisms in risky decision making and implicit probabilistic sequence learning and an adaptive aspect of higher risk taking on the BART. Our results could help to clarify the neurocognitive complexity of decision making and its individual differences.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Asymmetric Reinforcement Learning Explains Human Choice Patterns in Decision-making Under Risk
Niloufar Shahdoust, Rhiannon L Cowan, … Elliot H. Smith·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2026
- Do adolescents take more risks? Not when facing a novel uncertain situation
Noémi Éltető, Karolina Janacsek, … Dezső Németh·Cognitive DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2019
- Rational arbitration between statistics and rules in human sequence processing
Maxime Maheu, Florent Meyniel, Stanislas Dehaene·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2022
- Rapid Changes in Risk Attitudes Originate from Bayesian Inference on Parietal Magnitude Representations
Gilles de Hollander, Marcus Grueschow, … Christian Carl Ruff·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 10, 2026
- Neural correlates of individual differences in aversion to risk and choice inconsistency
Manon E. Jaquerod, Alessandra Lintas, … Alessandro E. P. Villa·bioRxiv·May 10, 2021
- Early reaction time variability predicts implicit statistical learning: a comparison of four variability indices
Emanuele Ciardo, Andreas Alexandersen, … Dezső Németh·bioRxiv·May 31, 2026